User talk:Ojay123/Archives/2009/July
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ojay123. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Newsletter
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Outreach/July {{subst:2009}} Newsletter}} Ojay123 (talk) 02:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Edit Count
Use this tool :) Gary King (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Dotson Ice Shelf
Hi. Why did you post a deletion notice for this page on my talk page? I cannot think of a valid reason for deleting this page. RedWolf (talk) 23:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Ojay :)
I see you noticed my edit to Mary Whitehouse and it appears you have reverted it. May i ask why this is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.193.117 (talk) 16:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Question on recent revert
I just signed up for wikipedia because I felt that there was more to be said about the article relating to Pulsed Laser Deposition. For my first post, I'll admit, it was a bit bland and some of the information was scattered elsewhere in the article. Going forward, do you have any suggestions on how to make additions that won't get reverted by those who patrol wikipedia such as yourself? I don't want to get discouraged too early in this process. Thanks
Re: New user template
Please be a little more careful ..
This edit [1] is not to your credit. Huggle and rollback are powerful tools, but they are not foolproof, and the onus is on you to ensure that the edits you make are correct. Philip Trueman (talk) 10:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Your RfA
Hello, I am very sorry to tell you this but the chance of your RfA succeeding now is infinitesimal. I suggest withdrawing now and trying again after a few thousand edits which will show that you have enough experience. Sincerely, Triplestop x3 19:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)