January 2011

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chaz Bono. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 22:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chaz Bono, you may be blocked from editing. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 23:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chaz Bono. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
  3. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kaldari (talk) 23:10, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply