August 2024

edit

  Hi Omkar prakash! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Venkateswara several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Venkateswara, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 15:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vinayvinyill. Thank you. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 15:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am not sock, I reverted last full reverted revision which made done by sock user @Yugpsguts Omkar prakash (talk) 16:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
You are reverting to a version preferred by Vinayvinyill and his sockpuppets. I am trying to restore the stable version before all the latest disruption. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 16:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I revert all sock users.
Thanks Omkar prakash (talk) 16:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Vinayvinyill per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vinayvinyill. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 20:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply