OneLowDat

January 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Jeffrey Epstein are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 21:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

It was about improving the article, as he was clearly murdered and theres plenty of qualified people who can see this obvious murder! The question was which one should be referenced in reply to a query! Did you even read the comment?--OneLowDat (talk) 09:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 12:46, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OneLowDat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I stated the epstein page section on his death has multiple references for him being murdered and only the one official account claiming suicide (this contradicts the official claim of suicide), pointing out the 2 broken neck vertebra, the broken jaw and the broken hydroid all from a non drop fall. This cleary upset an admin who deleted my comment about improving the article by making it consistent and made offer about suitable people to quote stating it was murder (WHICH IS NOT NEEDED SINCE THE ARTICLE ALREADY SAYS ITS MURDER!) This has clearly upset the admin, who banned me for trying to make the article not contradict its self and to make it consistent! (read what I has said on the talk page! He has deleted that again as he does not want talk about things he does not agree with!) This admin clearly has let the power to go to his head and thrives on this being an achievement in his life! Its pathetic. Sorry I wasted my time trying to remove a clear contradiction! I guess what I have heard about how wiki is run these days is true! It use to be an unbiased accurate website (admins use to work towards), now it seems to be controlled people pushing their own views! without regard for consistency or accuracy! Its just appalling people in authority on this site can act like this and get away with it! It just shows the standard wiki has fallen too and is no longer trusted or respected!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲_水 10:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.