Onellie Davenport

March 2018

Hello, I'm KNHaw. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Burke and Wills expedition have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. KNHaw ^(talk) 06:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Newtown, New South Wales. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KNHaw ^(talk) 06:26, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Newtown, New South Wales, you may be blocked from editing. Travelbird (talk) 06:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Why pets are Called A persons BFF

Draft:Why pets are Called A persons BFF, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Why pets are Called A persons BFF and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Why pets are Called A persons BFF during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 22:57, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Why pets are Called A persons BFF

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Why pets are Called A persons BFF, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 23:10, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Davenporta

Draft:Davenporta, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Davenporta and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Davenporta during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)