Oodus

I disagree with your wanton reversion of a cleanup I did on Jim Halpert and have reverted it as such. Next time, why don't you discuss something like that on the article's talk page to get a bit of consensus with the people who have been working on the article for awhile. I don't mean to "bite the newbies", but don't wholesale revert good-faith edits that truly make the article better. Can't you just make your own new changes without destroying the work of others? BabuBhatt 21:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello Oodus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 16:48, 25 August 2006 (UTC) ╫

Re: sean mc sean and VCS

Hi. Thank you for you concern, and a sorry for the slow response.

I started a discussion in Talk:List of gangs in Grand Theft Auto series regarding the matter, and invited Sean to participate and state his case. That's probably the best that I can do for now.

Thanks again. ╫ ２５ ^{◀RingADing▶} 14:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC) ╫

Office summaries

You should see them before I help them out. Crap writing and people inferring things not actually shown. Perhaps you should read the summaries on the numerous fan sites out there? Why do you dislike the summaries? BabuBhatt 22:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

I think that the episode summaries should include some of the humor that makes the show so great; without it, the summaries are boring. I think you should check out these links where maybe the fansites prefer a mundane, pointless summary to an episode. I have not heard similar criticism from any other editors. BabuBhatt 16:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Who do you believe the episode summaries appeal to? I just don't see people caring enough to read an encyclopedia entry in one particular episode of a sitcom unless they are a fan of the episode. I think you'll find that my work with the summaries makes them more concise and compact in many cases. I will admit that perhaps there should be fewer quotes from the show, but sometimes their exact works are all that can construe the bizarre nature of some of the action on the show. BabuBhatt 17:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to List of characters in Grand Theft Auto IV has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 16:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nagi Springfield, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. cmelbye (^t/_c) 18:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

P&R

Hey Oodus, I'm Hunter, I do a lot of the work on the Parks and Recreation episode and season articles.. I saw that you had done some early work on Flu Season (Parks and Recreation). Thanks very much for doing that! I hope you don't mind my changes and additions to the plot summary. Let me know if you did. Thanks again! — Hunter Kahn 17:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

• Nice work on the Wikiquote page! I can see how it would be tough keeping it to two quotes per episode, but these seem to be the right choices. I've added the Wikiquote box to the external links sections of the third season episodes and I intend to do the rest for the rest of the episodes hopefully soon (although if you can help with that a bit where you can, it'd be appreciated). Keep up the good work! — Hunter Kahn 06:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Indianapolis (Parks and Recreation)

Hey Oodus. I see that somebody redirected Indianapolis (Parks and Recreation) back to the season three article. That's probably because since it was only plot summary, they thought it didn't meet the guidelines for its own article as specified by WP:N and WP:TVMOS. Just wanted to let you know that I haven't had a chance to work on the article yet because I moved into my new house this weekend and I won't have Internet at home for a while yet. As soon as I get myself situated on that end, I'm going to work on the article and add some reliable sources and make "Indianapolis" a stand-alone article again. When that time comes, the plot summary you wrote is still preserved in the article history, so I'll bring it back in to the article. Just wanted to let you know it's not gone forever, and give you an explanation as to my absence. :) Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 15:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

• I'm sure your plot summary is fine (I haven't read it yet, because I missed the episode due to the move!) and in any event, it'll definitely be helpful to have for the article when it comes time to make it. — Hunter Kahn 16:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Harvest Festival (Parks and Recreation)

Hey Oodus. I started the Harvest Festival (Parks and Recreation) article, but as you can see, I haven't done the plot summary yet. I can work on this in a few days if need be, but if you'd like to do your magic on it, it'd be much appreciated! No pressure if you can't. — Hunter Kahn 00:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks Oodus. And yup, all settled. Nicely done on the plot summary. I had to tighten it a bit to get it within WP:TVPLOT standards, but now thanks to you the finished touches on the article are complete and it's all good for its GAN nom. — Hunter Kahn 05:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Signature

Hey, just wanted to make sure you knew, if you put ~~~~ at the end of your comments it'll automatically put up your signature, right? My apologies if you knew this already, but I just wanted to be sure! — Hunter Kahn 00:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Soulmates (Parks and Recreation)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Lucky (Parks and Recreation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucky (Parks and Recreation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucky (Parks and Recreation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Soda Tax (Parks and Recreation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soda Tax (Parks and Recreation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soda Tax (Parks and Recreation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 18:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)