User talk:OpalYosutebito/Archive 1

Archive 1

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giuseppe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pino and Peppino. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi

Why did you move this page [1]? Is there some policy that prefers full names even if it isn't common? DareshMohan (talk) 06:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

I thought moving it to his full name would make more sense since that's how most pages related to people are anyway, and it's not his pen/stage name (some people are credited with only their first name). If you still don't agree with me, I will move it back (with a redirect), and leave moving pages for fixing spelling errors

OpalYosutebito (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

IMDb title

Please don't add title, only need the I'd Morekar (talk) 06:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Got it, thanks. I was trying to clean up pages using IMDb title with unknown parameters.

OpalYosutebito (talk) 12:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Danners430 (talk) 07:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. I just turned on that preference. OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

I just wanted to thank you for all the great work that you are doing in Wikipedia!.Tony the Marine (talk) 02:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Yeah you're welcome :D OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:43, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the deprecated border parameter from film infoboxes. Can you also do the same with image_size please? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

I keep forgetting to do that. Thanks for helping me out too - OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:56, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Pages using infobox organization with motto or pledge‎

Just curious, are you using AutoWikiBrowser? And if you are, I'd like to help.Naraht (talk) 16:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

I just applied for it OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

You've been doing this by hand? AWB should make it easier and if you would like to work on the query together let me know. Easiest may be one of us starting with organization_motto and pledge to at least get those without getting in the way of the others. (no organization_motto or pledge at this point.)Naraht (talk) 22:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

That sounds great. I'll let you know as soon as I get approved for using the bot. I'm also planning on cleaning up Category:Pages using infobox film with unknown parameters - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Some things that you may or may not know. The Sort criteria in the unknown parameter pages are (almost) always done as "bad parameter" followed by the name of the article. The effect of this is that a large group of articles in alphabetical order in one of these categories almost always have the same bad parameter. So for example, in Category:Pages using infobox film with unknown parameters , the first 8 or 9 pages (didn't count) are all in order (except 2 entries) under the letter B so, they all have the same bad entry, which is Border. (one of the others is Box Office). So you search and remove Border. However, it is possible that such a parameter could have the pipe prior to it on the left on the line, or on the right (or theoretically neither, but unlikely) and there could be space before and after. After you get it, I'll send you the combinations of regex that I tend to use. If I get on tonight, I'll try to take out a chunk of the motto/pledge. Let me know what your status is.Naraht (talk) 23:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

I think I already knew that, thanks OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

NP. I was able to do most of "N" and "O" using AWB, but as you can tell, it didn't get *everything* some of them are in a form that trying to make a regex to get them is too complicated, like if all of the infobox is placed on one line (like say cite web is normally done). I'll keep attacking it using AWB when I have a chance. And no, I don't have the ability to approve people in AWB. :(Naraht (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

I'm not gonna use the bot for motto and pledge because more often than not I've seen sources in there which could screw things up and get us in trouble if they're removed - OpalYosutebito (talk) 00:22, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Which is why the user needs to look at each one before saving. AWB gives more control than pure Bots do. I'll keep going on motto. Naraht (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

I'm going to be busy for the next couple of days due to final exams, but I'll still be available if anything happens - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Update: I got approved to use the bot, and I'm doing my best to get stuff done. I'll let you know if things go south - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Cool. I'll head to bed soon, but I'm into the Ss, Didn't catch all of them, but we are down to around 700 with what I've done so far.Naraht (talk) 04:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Nite. I hope I'm helping out :D OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Saw your request for AWB access and wanted to reach out with an offer to help if needed. I've long had tackling unknown parameter categories on my list of potential tasks and find them perfect candidates for AWB work, but potentially quite tricky to make regexs which is the part I would be happy to help with. I also noticed that there's a lot of empty bad parameters and I see no reason why those shouldn't be done using a bot which I could seek approval for if you want. --Trialpears (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

I haven't been using regexs, but it would still be great if you had a bot to help out too - OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Trialpears I (naraht, not OpalYosutebito) am using AWB to handle some and I use four different regexes to handle pipe before, pipe after and a couple of other situations as well. I *think* it is handling about 75% of the ones that are motto (the other two parameters that feed into that cat aren't generating any). All of these are in Find and Replace - advanced settings replacements with everything checked. (and all of these are replaced with |)

• \| *motto *= *[^|]+\n\|
• \|\n *motto *= *[^|]+\|
• \|\n *motto *= *\|
• \| *motto *= *\n\|

Naraht (talk) 16:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Nice! I would use something like\|\s*motto\s*=[^|{}]*({{[^}]+}})?[^|}]*. This way it can also deal with parameters containing a template and if the parameter is the last one in the infobox with only one regex. \s means any whitespace character so tabs, spaces and newlines and is probably the most useful character set imo. If you want to know more about what everything means I would recommend regex101.com which explains everything and has a regex debugger.

I also filed a quick BRFA. No idea how long it will take since it was a long time since last time I filed one. Probably between a day and a month. --Trialpears (talk) 16:21, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Trialpears I know what it means, I just didn't think it was quite safe enough. For example, Philodemic Society has | motto = {{ubl|{{lang|la|Eloquentiam Libertati Devinctam}}|([[Latin]] for "Eloquence in Defense of Liberty")}} and it thinks the end of the entry is in the pipe prior to ([[. I am trying to use what you had though, but expecting them to have issues, and it does appear to be getting some of the rest.Naraht (talk) 03:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

You could expand it to \|\s*motto\s*=[^|{}]*({{[^{}]*({{[^{}]*}})?[^{}]*}})?[^|}]* to deal with nested templates. If you need to remove more templates you can always add in options for that as well, the expression just grows and the risk you make mistakes when writing the regex increases. Generally I go back and forth quite a bit between running AWB and improving my replacements since I enjoy that part and it usually makes it faster in the long run. --Trialpears (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for all your help! I don't have much patience when it comes to programming/coding with bots, but maybe one day, we'll make a regex script or something that gets rid of those nonexistent/unknown parameters once and for all! - OpalYosutebito (talk) 01:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

It seems like you guys have done an incredibly amount of work on these categories. Is approval for bot removal still of interest for other categories or is it kind of moot now? If so I will withdraw the BRFA. Trialpears (talk) 20:46, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

TrialpearsI periodically do these, the question is whether a bot would simply be given an infobox, or an infobox and a bad parameter.Naraht (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

I'm thinking it would only remove certain manually specified empty parameters to keep it as simple as possible. If it's common for there being large And I'm not planning on it being run on a schedule, but rather on request. There's no technical reason why it couldn't be run on a schedule removing all empty parameters from a large number of pages, but that would need an explicit consensus to implement. Trialpears (talk) 23:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Since the end goal is to clean up the unknown parameters from the infoboxes...

Here's the method I use to get rid of unknown parameters (for reference: right now I'm working on cleaning up the infobox Russian inhabited locality template calls): Under "Options", I open "Advanced Settings", and I create a new "in Template call" rule under the "Rule" tab. It's important to know that in order for this to work for all pages in the category, you need to need to take redirects into consideration (ex: Infobox Russian village redirects to Infobox Russian inhabited locality, which is what I'm ultimately focused on). I hope my explanation made sense, and I hope this method helps everyone out a bit more - OpalYosutebito (talk) 21:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for all of the work on cleaning up Category:Pages using infobox organization with motto or pledge Naraht (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Nonexistent parameters

The LOGO parameter of the organization template is technically obsolete; it was removed from the template a couple of years ago, so it did exist. Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 04:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Good to know, thanks. I'll work more on Wikipedia over winter break - OpalYosutebito (talk) 05:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Voodoo Tiger

Sorry for the rollback, but you made a mess of something there; not quite sure what. I invite you to look again! Josh Milburn (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Oh yeah. Now I understand. I accidentally removed a parameter without removing its value. I hope my more recent edit cleaned it up - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Miss Shetty Mr Polishetty

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Miss Shetty Mr Polishetty, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Miss Shetty Mr Polishetty

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Miss Shetty Mr Polishetty, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi

Hello.... How are you doing? Jutos222 (talk) 21:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

I'm doing ok. What's up? - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:56, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Lost in the Game (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lost in the Game (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost in the Game (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Epa101 (talk) 13:46, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

1998 CPSL League Cup

Hi there, just wanted to bring your attention to various errors created by your recent edit of 1998 CPSL League Cup. Your changes broke the infobox and duplicated the first paragraph. No big deal, it's been fixed - mostly I wanted to give you a heads up in case this was the result of a script running amok somehow. If it was just an oversight, no worries. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 04:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing and you're welcome! - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Gonzalo Lira

Hello, could you give a spell check to this article by Gonzalo Lira? https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalo_Lira 190.219.223.169 (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm not autoconfirmed on that wiki because I only made 2 edits. I'll look into it once I meet the criteria - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Minor edits on talk pages

Hi, could you possibly mark parameter changes on talk pages as "minor" so they don't flag up on everyone's watchlist? Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Okay. I'll be sure to do that in the future - OpalYosutebito (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For all the small and repetitive but necessary and welcome all the same edits you make that show up on our watchlists. They do not go unnoticed. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello OpalYosutebito!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Some parameters exist!

Hello.
I saw some of your edits, checked one(diff) and checked the documentation for the template {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and found out that one of the parameters you are removing "blp=no" exists!
The documentations says the following, among other things: "[..] Set to |blp=no for dead persons. This parameter must be added for biographical articles.".

– 2804:F14:80C6:A301:70C8:DCC8:4027:D6BB (talk) 04:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

I didn't know that, thanks! I'll try to keep an eye out for that - OpalYosutebito (talk) 04:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

You might consider removing all unsupported parameters instead of one or two at a time

Re this edit, some unsupported parameters were left behind, so another edit to the article was needed. I have fixed the unsupported parameter check in the relevant infobox template, which may help you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

ok, thanks. I'll do my best to check for anything out of the ordinary - OpalYosutebito (talk) 22:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Harem

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Harem, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

fixing/removing associated acts param

Hi, probably should double-check your edits as some are showing up in Category:Articles using duplicate arguments in template calls. I monitor that category because I make the same type of mistakes quite a bit. Dawnseeker2000 05:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Sorry about that. I'll see what I can do - OpalYosutebito (talk) 05:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Rocío Dúrcal, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 06:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

past_member_of

I see you've made several edits such as this one on jazz biographies, replacing associated_acts with past_member_of in Infobox musical artist infoboxes. This and lots of other examples are wrong, as the lists name individuals, not groups or bands. Could you undo such changes, please? Removing the whole entry is probably the best solution. EddieHugh (talk) 10:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok. I'll do that ASAP - OpalYosutebito (talk) 12:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Just bringing this up again. You have made this mistake to many, prossibly hundreds, of articles (see [2][3][4][5][6][7]) and have only, as far as I cans see, fixed this on the Tommy Flannagan article. Is there anyway you can automate a revert on all of these edits as it will take a long time to clean this up manually. Vladimir.copic (talk) 01:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok. I'll do whatever I can to fix this mistake - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Anthony Burger

I see you removed an associated act for Anthony Burger here. Not only did he perform and record with the group, but it was also his first his first professional recording, at age 12. I added a cite to hold over but I will find cites to include that tidbit. Maybe Chattanooga Cadek Conservatory of Music has archives. I doubt this will be enough (Album Cover) Album link to satisfy cite requirements because Discogs is user generated. ASCAP or BMI may have a record of the recording in their database. Happy editing P37307 (talk) 02:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the source! I barely saw any info on the page regarding the Celestials, and it was worded to make it sound like he merely collaborated with the band instead of being an actual member/player - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome. It is worded weird. I'll put this page on my list to find cites, etc. In that album cover photo I included above, he is the one in the whitish suit. I really hope I can find an official source, other than that album cover at Discogs, to show he was only 12-years old. Happy editing! P37307 (talk) 03:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Agency parameter

I have reverted this edit of yours. |agency= is a proper parameter for {{Cite web}} and {{Cite news}}. If I have missed something, please let me know. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

I just noticed you are making these edits en masse. You need to stop immediately. I'll give you a few minutes before I block you to stop the editing. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

I have temporarily removed your permission for AWB until this is figured out. Please respond here asap and justify the edits you are making. It appears to be thousands over the last few days and there is no way to go through each one to determine if you are removing parameters that are actually appropriate. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

For the edit you reverted, I found an error in one of the citations. The error I'm referring to is here. For all of these pages that I edited, I saw reference errors that said {{cite magazine}}: Empty citation (help): Unknown parameter |agency= ignored (help)

I hope this explains my reasoning. I'll try to be more careful - OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Yet you removed all of the agency parameters, even valid ones in that edit. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Also, looking at a few more of your edits, it appears that these shouldn't just be deleted, they should be fixed. You are removing good reference information that just isn't using the appropriate parameter. The point of the warning is to fix the issue, not just delete it without reviewing it. You made 16 edits in one minute! You aren't reviewing anything you are editing. You are responsible for the edits you make. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

I've noticed that when the contents of the agency field is a piped link, AWB only gets part, ie "|agency=AFP" results in "|AFP]]" [8] being left behind, so they appear in Category:CS1 errors: unrecognized parameter.--Auric talk 15:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

I don't have the time to continue to dive into this issue. I have left a notice at WP:AN#Some Help with Bot-Like Editing to get some additional input. Please move the discussion there. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:26, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

okay. I'm fixing the errors I left behind. - OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:27, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Agency parameter in CS

Hi, it is regarding edits like this. The 'agency' is an 'unknown parameter' only when used with 'cite magazine'. It works fine when used to 'cite news' and others. Please, change 'agency' to 'last' in relevant cases only instead of removing it all together. See this for example, works fine. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:46, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm working on changing all of the "cite magazine" templates from my previous edits to "cite news" right now. Thanks for the example! - OpalYosutebito (talk) 15:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Don't need to change those not showing any CS error. India Today and Outlook for example are magazines. Previously the 'agency' parm would work fine, but apparently the code was changed recently. I do "agency→last" wherever this new CS error pops up. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

This does not fix the problem with this editing. The purpose of the CS error is not to just delete it so it goes away. It should be fixed. An example would be this edit where Opal just deleted the parameter, yet the correct outcome would be to replace {{Citation}} with {{Cite web}}. This mindless "clean-up" of maintenance templates (averaging 12 edits a minute) is detrimental to the project and runs counter to the purpose of maintenance categories. This is blockable behavior for operating AWB like a bot without bot approval. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:43, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

it's also an unknown parameter in "cite book", "cite report", "cite web", etc, so the only way to get rid of the error message and keep the agency parameter is to use "cite news" instead, which I'm working on right now - OpalYosutebito (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Kim Jong-suk politician photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kim Jong-suk politician photo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Ok. I'll see what I can do - OpalYosutebito (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Category:1783 in Hong Kong has been nominated for merging

Category:1783 in Hong Kong has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I already replied, agreeing with you - OpalYosutebito (talk) 21:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Favre-Leuba

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Favre-Leuba, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations in South Korea opened in the 2006

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in South Korea opened in the 2006 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

That's fine by me. It was an accident to begin with - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations in Korea opened in 1912

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in Korea opened in 1912 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations in Sri Lanka opened in 1912

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in Sri Lanka opened in 1912 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations in Malaysia opened in 1917

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in Malaysia opened in 1917 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

With Regards to Cyrax

Thank you for your help, but I feel the need to bring this up. Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've learned while fixing Cyrax's info, Niger and Nigeria are separate countries, Cyrax's bio says she's from Niger, and the spelling for people from those countries is way too similar. According to google, people from Niger are called "Nigeriens" while people from Nigeria are "Nigerians". I changed Cyrax's info back, but if you or know someone who knows the correct words for this, please feel free to change it accordingly. OilSlick96 (talk) 06:19, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh. Sorry, I forgot about that. I had kind of a brain fart, I guess - OpalYosutebito (talk) 12:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Special Barnstar!

	Death in Venice
	Yo Babysharkboss2!! (Slap me with the fish. I dare you.) 18:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I didn't know you had a Wikipedia account too :) - OpalYosutebito (talk) 18:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations in Panama opened in 2024

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in Panama opened in 2024 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Fowler Loomis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations in Northern Ireland opened in 1903

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in Northern Ireland opened in 1903 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations in Northern Ireland closed in 1937

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in Northern Ireland closed in 1937 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 11:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)