Orangeshirt122722

Dick Pic

We really don't need a dick pic on the Dick pic page. I opened the page not expecting to see a penis and I, personally, don't want other people to experience that. If someone wants to see a penis on Wikipedia, they can go to Penis. Queenofconfusion (talk) 07:54, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

It doesn't make sense that you can see a penis on the penis page but not the dick pic page.

The dick pic page is the one page on all of wikipedia where an example of what a dick pic actually is is the most common sense, no-brainer, and and fair. If the breasts page can have an image of breasts, and the Abraham Lincoln page can have a picture of Abraham Lincoln, the dick pic page can have a picture of the subject matter for educational purposes. This is an encylcopedia with the purpose of educating, hence when the picture is warranted and appropriate and illustrative with the intent to make clear what a dick pic is.

We really do need a dick pic on the dick pic page. Orangeshirt122722 (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

IT WAS YOUR OWN DICK!!! Queenofconfusion (talk) 14:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are blocked for edit warring against consensus, disruptive editing, inserting sexually explicit photos against consensus and trolling. Cullen328 (talk) 07:59, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

The dick pic page is the one page on all of wikipedia where an example of what a dick pic actually is is the most common sense, no-brainer, and and fair. If the breasts page can have an image of breasts, and the Abraham Lincoln page can have a picture of Abraham Lincoln, the dick pic page can have a picture of the subject matter for educational purposes. This is an encylcopedia with the purpose of educating, hence when the picture is warranted and appropriate and illustrative with the intent to make clear what a dick pic is. Orangeshirt122722 (talk) 08:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

None of that bullshit rationale you spouted above justifies edit warring or editing against consensus. That behavior amounts to trolling, and you have been blocked as a result. So, carefully read the unblock instructions above, and submit an appeal of your block that convinces another administrator that you are right and I am wrong. As for your Abraham Lincoln comparison, spurious and ludicrous and absurd and insulting and foolish and unwise and counterproductive are a few words that come to mind. I will stop there but I could go on. Cullen328 (talk) 08:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

It is absolutely ridiculous and absurd to accuse someone of that doing wrondoing by inserting a dick pic to the dick pic page, and you are warring with me to make such a ridiculous charge. What is wikipedia's shame with dick pics? Wikipedia can show breasts on the breasts page, a penis on the penis page, Abraham Lincoln's picture on the Abraham Lincoln page, but not an picture of a dick pic on the dick pic page? That's contrary to logic, and YOU folks are the ones not here to build an encyclopedia, not me. Stop harrassing me for doing the right thing. If I was a woman uploading a vagina shot to the vagina page, none of this would be levelled against me, the hypocrisy. Orangeshirt122722 (talk) 08:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Since you have chosen to continue with your ridiculous trolling, your talk page access has been revoked. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 08:17, 29 December 2022 (UTC)