Outcomer

Welcome!

Hello, Outcomer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JFW | T@lk 23:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

P.S. Never too late for a "proper" welcome. Would you consider joining WP:PHARM, where medication-related topics are discussed.

February 2014

Your recent editing history at Moon landing conspiracy theories shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.   — Jess· Δ♥ 04:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Jess, you do understand that this is incorrect data that you have just reverted to? The information YOU have reverted to is falsified. The Myth Busters did not address the entire #5 myth, so the entire statement YOU reverted to is false, yet I am getting flagged for an edit war? All other members who have reverted WITHOUT MAKING THEIR OWN EDITS have FALSIFIED data by reverting to the original INSTEAD of editing to correct. They are therefore violating the verifiabilty policy. Outcomer (talk) 02:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

You need to discuss that on the article talk page, not continue reverting. Read over WP:EW, it talks about this. Thanks.   — Jess· Δ♥ 02:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

I understand WP:EW, but I also understand that leaving the statement that you and the others reverted to in there is violating the Verifiabilty policy. I don't understand why a false statement can simply be re-added. It is completely falsified data that needs to be erased... and obviously by someone else as my statement which is not original research and is backed up by the video reference is called out as being a lie, when in fact the original entry was the lie and I am fixing it. Bottom line: the other two parties were having an edit war AND falsifying data, as they didn't even ATTEMPT to discuss the changes and instead reverted without hesitation. I at least provided sound argument, yet I am the only one that got flagged? Wikipedia has turned into a laughing stock of unverifiable information and police that act without just cause.Outcomer (talk) 02:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

If you're reverting without discussing, then you don't understand WP:EW. There's nothing wrong with that, we're all new here once. But now I've explained it, so go to the talk page and discuss your changes.   — Jess· Δ♥ 02:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

I see you just posted to the article talk page. Thanks. I responded to you there. All the best,   — Jess· Δ♥ 03:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Actually I'm not new here. I've been on Wikipedia since the beginning and didn't use a username for a long time. Thanks for responding! Outcomer (talk) 03:24, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Cardano

Outcomer, there's already a draft in progress for the Cardano cryptocurrency at Draft:Cardano (cryptocurrency platform), please see if you can expand it and submit for review rather than creating a version from scratch at Cardano. ST47 (talk) 21:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Im having your account flagged for an edit war Outcomer (talk) 21:14, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Standard message is not acceptable. The Cardano article is not being published obviously due to some form of bias from you or one of your colleagues. It's quite shameful actually at this point, as you are not following the notability guidelines which have been followed tooth and nail! The article you linked to is following those guidelines. Outcomer (talk) 21:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)