April 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that in this edit to Tate Kobang, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Ovawest. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Tate Kobang, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:24, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 2NumForIce (speak|edits) 20:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tate Kobang, you may be blocked from editing. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours because of your persistent editing contrary to the guideline on conflict of interest and the policy on promotional editing, both of which you have been informed of, and because you have openly stated your intention of indefinitely reverting an article to your preferred version, which is know as "edit-warring", and is disruptive. Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so nobody can be blamed for starting out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that they don't know about. However, continuing to do the same things after being told about the relevant policies and guidelines is a different matter.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 21:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply