P111222
November 2013
editPlease do not blank closed Articles for Deletion discussions. They are kept as a record. George8211 conversations 18:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- John Galea should have his own page. His page should of not been deleted.
- I appreciate your point, however discussions with the blue background are archives, and should not be modified. If you feel that he should have an article, go to Articles for Creation or Requested articles. George8211 conversations 18:57, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/John Galea, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 19:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. George Ho (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Your edits to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Galea after the discussion has closed, have no effect on the result at all. If you're concerned about the comments in the discussion you can use Template:Xfd-privacy. Peter James (talk) 20:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Johngalea24 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 21:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |