If you can identify independent reviews of "PDFNet SDK", by reputable sources (preferably in print), I will look at them. John Vandenberg (talk) 00:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
If an article doesnt have the credible sources on it, and isnt written in an encyclopedic manner, it may be deleted as WP:CSD#g11. There is an expectation that an admin will look for sources if it is an obviously "notable" topic, however it isnt required. In this case, I wasnt able to find any quickly[1].
This looks ok; can you identify others? John Vandenberg (talk) 01:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)