User talk:PM800/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, PM800, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Hi thanks for the comments but as the person in question admits he has no qualifications in the discipline I think you would agree the comments are in fact constructive. Or is it your subjectiviity getting in the way of what Wikipedia is supposed to be? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.253.235.159 (talk) 08:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Brian Hunter (card player)

A tag has been placed on Brian Hunter (card player) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -Zeus- [t|c] 03:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Brian Hunter (card player)

I have nominated Brian Hunter (card player), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Hunter (card player). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -Zeus- [t|c] 16:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jonathan Chu

A tag has been placed on Jonathan Chu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -Zeus- [t|c] 19:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jonathan Chu

I have nominated Jonathan Chu, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Chu. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -Zeus- [t|c] 20:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jonathan Chu

A tag has been placed on Jonathan Chu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Patton^t/c 20:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Notability of Justin Desai

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Justin Desai, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Justin Desai seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Justin Desai, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Rube Marquard

Can you give reliable sourcing that everything he mentioned in The Glory of Their Times is false. If there is no sourcing I have to revert, as BLP applies, especially the section on the deceased. Secret ^account 14:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Three Little Pigskins, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sottolacqua (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Clue (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sottolacqua (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Please visit the Wikipedia:Quotations article to better understand when quotations should be used.

Deletion

Hi. The total content was: "Ziggy Hasbrouck was a reserve infielder for the 1916 and 1917 Chicago White Sox." That's a speedy for lack of content. He's certainly worth an article, but there isn't anything here other than an opening sentence. Furthermore, there's no need to come onto my talk page with an attitude. I'm only too happy to help resolve things like this. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

• Per the recommendation of another user, I not only restored the page but I expanded it as well. Not much to go by on the guy since he played only briefly. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jim Duncan (baseball)

A tag has been placed on Jim Duncan (baseball) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. → Ãlways Ãhëad (talk) 01:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes I'm a dumbass for trying to delete an article about a guy that died over 100 years ago who made no records whats soever. --→ Ãlways Ãhëad (talk) 01:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		That actually made me laugh. → Ãlways Ãhëad (talk) 01:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Fred Snodgrass

I like all the edits you made to the Fred Snodgrass article. I do a lot of this kind of cleanup myself. However, I noticed that you ran his New York Times obit verbatim. This is clearly in violation of WP:CP so I removed the material. If I might suggest, you could quote a portion of the obit and summarize the rest. Just make sure that the amount of material you use from the Times adheres to the guidelines. Thanks. Allreet (talk) 23:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake. The entire section was in red, so I probably read the edit dif wrong. My apologies. Allreet (talk) 23:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation links

While your work on baseball team-season pages is appreciated, it would be more helpful if you would create links to the proper pages. For instance, on the 1912 Boston Red Sox season page, you created two links to Joe Wood. If you click on that, you will notice that rather than going where you want to go, it goes to a list of people named Joe Wood. I have fixed this so that the link points properly, to Smoky Joe Wood. Many of your recent edits have been pointing to these disambiguation pages, which means that other people have to go in and clean these pages up so that they link properly, which means that the same job is being done twice. If you could be a bit more careful in making these edits, it would be greatly helpful. Thanks very much. -Dewelar (talk) 21:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Removal of maintenance templates

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Kevin Shannon. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

That "reference" you pointed out leads to a link that provides no information about the subject. You must link to content that specifically mentions the subject. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kevin Shannon

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kevin Shannon, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Shannon. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kevin Shannon. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

James Stephen Smith

I am not particularly interested in getting into an edit war with you, but I consider it very rude to undo an edit which was originally done because of POV considerations. It is not "common knowledge", and even if it were you are obligated to provide a source to back it up. This event is 23 years old and is basically forgotten in the minds of most fans. Perhaps YOU thing the story of Steve Smith begins and ends with this one goal, but I disagree. Please add a reliable source, or do not undo edits done in good faith.--Freshfighter9 (talk) 23:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Paul-waner.jpg in the 1927 World Series Article

Hi, could you not put File:Paul-waner.jpg in 1927 World Series? This is a non-free image without a rationale for use in this particular article, and the use of this image would only be decorative, and would not be considered fair use. If you really believe it is fair use, you're more than welcome to write a rationale based on WP:NONFREE. Thanks. --Mosmof (talk) 22:46, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Mc/Mac sorting

Hi, you undid my edit of Fred McMullin. I have changed it back, and I just wanted to point out to you that the correct sort key is Macmullin, Fred. Please see WP:MCSTJR for more information. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 00:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vaughn Snyder

A tag has been placed on Vaughn Snyder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — 141.156.165.77 (talk) 11:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Assume Good Faith

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Clerks II. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RandomGuy666 (talk) 19:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:FanFiction.Net#FAIL. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Joe Chill (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Repost of Macy's Day Parade (Green Day song)

A tag has been placed on Macy's Day Parade (Green Day song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. The previous deletion discussion was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macy's Day Parade (song). R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Ray Schalk

To comply with Wikipedia's No Original Research policy, can you please cite reliable sourcing linking Ray Schalk's 1919 World Series performance to his Hall of Fame induction? Any help is appreciated.Orsoni (talk) 15:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tom Savage (football)

The article Tom Savage (football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article on a non-professional athlete, so he doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE, makes no claims of being notable under the general notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 22:31, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:LerynFranco.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:LerynFranco.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Non-free logo in 2000 Anaheim Angels season

I don't understand why you keep inserting the non-free logo in 2000 Anaheim Angels season. There's no FUR for these season articles, and logos should not be used for season articles. --Mosmof (talk) 03:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your response and congratulations on having such a talented dog. --Mosmof (talk) 04:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your edit summary here. Res2216firestar 23:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Calm Down

There is no need for things like this:[1]. You should read this Wikipedia:Do not insult the vandals--Yankees10 17:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Looks like PM800 has the temper of a little child! He never explains his edits in a reasonable way, whereas he´s a king with simple-minded remarks and likes to insult his fellow human beings without cause! I just saw another edit of PM800 with "N00b": [2]
Dear PM800, you have to apologize for your rude and inappropriate behavior! Otherwise your writing permission is at risk. --93.134.104.98 (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

WP:BITE

Hi PM800. Sorry to remind you of something you're probably already aware of, but Wikipedia encourages editors to be polite to other editors, even when they're wrong, and to encourage newcomers, even where their efforts don't actually end up being helpful. I'm specifically referring to this edit you made, where it probably would have been more gentlemanly to explain to the user what they did wrong, or failing that settle for reverting their edit without insulting them. Thank you. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

• Actually, I've just reviewed your recent contributions. "Dense"[3], "dumbass"[4][5], "worthless turd"[6] and "stupid little message"[7] are not appropriate ways to address another editor under any circumstances. You should take pains to be more civil to other editors in future (including in your edit summaries) or you may face administrative action, including blocks. Thanks. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Brady Anderson

So instead of discussing it, like you should, you just want to keep reverting? If not, I guess I could just report you for violating WP:3RR.--Yankees10 01:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

And what exactly would you be reporting me on? I have not done anything, you on the other hand have.--Yankees10 01:14, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Check again buddy, its 3 times.--Yankees10 01:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Why be uncivil. For what purpose does that have. Judging by your talk page, I can see that is a huge problem for you. Now would you like to start a discussion on Brady Anderson at WP:baseball or are we going to continue bullshitting and throwing little insults.--Yankees10 01:27, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Wow, just wow. You will now be reported.--Yankees10 01:30, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Reiser

Here we go again. Are you going to continue to immaturely revert, or are you going give an explanation to why?--Yankees10 02:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Immature reverts are Yankees10's nature.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 09:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Please don't bite the newcomers

Please remember to Assume good faith, and not to bite the newcomers as you did with this edit. Thank you. Pilif12p :  Yo  21:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. --Two for the price of one! While I'm here, please do remember to warn the vandals you revert. :) Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 20:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Coach K

Hi there. I saw you added back a bunch of external links to Coach K's page. I'm not sure why, as you didn't include an edit summary. Anyway, take a look at the policy for external links when you get a chance so you can ensure that your edits are as productive as possible in the future.

More broadly, it also seems like you may want to consider re-evaluating your general approach to editing here. While I'm glad not to have had any problems with you myself, a review of your talk page suggests that you sometimes act in a way that reasonable people could construe as running afoul of WP:DICK. In short, be nice to people and extend them the courtesy of letting them know why you're reverting their changes (especially when they've taken the time to explain theirs). As you surely know, failing to do so leads to more serious sanctions, including a block on your account.

Happy editing. — Bdb484 (talk) 06:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Arky Vaughan

I dont have a link since it was like two or three years ago, so you can bring it up to WP:Baseball since it was so long ago I guess.--Yankees10 22:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Thats why I said "you can bring it up to WP:Baseball since it was so long ago"--Yankees10 01:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Beg pardon?

Before you, again, accuse me of vandalism by omitting an edit summary, please read my edit summary in that removal of those inappropriate warnings. Şłџğģő 20:23, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Reversions

Hi there PM, VASCO from Portugal here,

regarding your reversions of my edits as anon (Jesús Gámez, Josemi and Cristian Díaz), i agree that the summaries might have been a little "suspicious", but i did the following: fix redirects, correct wrong info and revert some inaccuracies. Does that merit a reversion? I fail to see where.

In this case (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jes%C3%BAs_G%C3%A1mez&diff=376877342&oldid=376876763), i also fail to see which word in my summary striked you as "uncivil" or "offensive".

I have zero tolerance for "wise guy" edits and zero+1 for vandals, no respect for those whatsoever. As you can see in my account, as you i have rollback rights too, so i must be on the right side of WP... :)

That said, i apologize for any incovenience and/or misunderstandings, keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 18:51, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

• No reply? Unfortunately, getting used to it :( - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Unhelpful comments

Please try to be more courteous to anonymous contributors. Your comments here in response to a perfectly valid query were less than helpful. Please also remember to comment on content not contributors.

I note that this is not the first time someone has expressed concern regarding your comments towards other editors. I fully expect that if you continue in the same vein, you will find the issue being escalated to a more formal venue. Regards, _wjemather^bigissue 17:24, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Family

Welcome to Wikipedia. Use the sandbox for testing. The edits you made to the family sub-section of Lakshmi Mittal are highly controversial and derogatory.. Please refrain from using copyright sources or derogatory sources about anyone's family. Else you many be blocked from editing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Varanwal (talk) 20:33, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Umm....

What's the problem with this IP address - 216.155.153.104 (talk)? Could you try to check why with another administrator? みんな空の下 (トーク) 06:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

greek dip

i removed it because that dip is not turkish. its greek. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.140.211 (talk) 10:56, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

AIV page mistake

Just to let you know - I'm sure it was a mistake, but this edit of yours accidentally removed a report I made about a serial vandal. I was wondering why the guy hadn't been blocked yet... TheRealFennShysa (talk) 13:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Rollback

Please stop using rollback to undo my legitimate edits, as you have been doing on Eddie Collins and another article. Rollback is only to be used against vandalism or other instances where it is perfectly clear why you're reverting. It's totally unclear why you would revert my edits, which first removed slanderous content, and then added a page number and additional content from a reference. See Wikipedia:Rollback#When_to_use_rollback. If you keep following me around and reverting me, I know where to report you. --74.138.214.5 (talk) 01:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Dev

this is regarding me posting sources on the article im wondering why u reverted my posts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.242.161.153 (talk) 22:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User_talk:173.196.174.187, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You have been warned several times about personal attacks against other editors. Please stop immediately. Netalarm^talk 20:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Netalarm, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. →ROUX ₪ 08:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for personal attacks. Calling another editor a moron is completely unacceptable. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry about this, but I cannot turn a blind eye to such an attack. Wikipedians are volunteers and calling another volunteer a "moron" is not conducive to a pleasant editing environment. If you're stressed, step away from the computer and get some fresh air or something. If something is bothering you on-wiki or IRL, I'm happy to talk about it by email, but I'm afraid there is no excuse for such an attack. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Rickyrab here. For some reason I was autoblocked because of PM800 because I use similar IPs. Which makes me wonder if PM800 goes to Rutgers University (who owns the IPs in question). To PM800: Wikipedia is a respectful community. We may have our disagreements, and they may be fierce sometimes, but NOBODY is an "idiot" or "moron" in the Wikipedia community. We are all (presumably) people (well, maybe the occasional e.t. from outer space or faery or god or demon chimes in, but I doubt it). The point is, respect other people and other beings, and they will respect you. — Rickyrab | Talk 02:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Nobody is "ugly", either, and nobody deserves to be called anything that begins with the word "fucking". (I read edit histories sometimes to see what the heck went on that caused blocking. Sometimes I read edit histories for lulz, too, but that's a separate item and a leisure pursuit. — Rickyrab | Talk 02:24, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Warnings

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Just because I trout slapped you doesn't make me vandal. Trout slaps are for when users who need to change their editing style. You do need to change your style. You constantly attack people and call them names. It got you blocked once already, and you're lucky that it was only once. if you don't stop you'll get permently blocked. And rember you can't warn people just because you don't like their edits. 74.89.58.36 (talk) 02:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

On a side note, I'm suprised you didn't complain about being blocked. 74.89.58.36 (talk) 02:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

ARE YOU SERIOUS? I am not vandalizing anything. It will be a lot easier to get you blocked then me right now 74.89.58.36 (talk) 02:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)