PSR B1937+21
Welcome!
|
Reference errors on 13 December
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the RD-170 page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
editThanks for your work on spaceflight articles! Appable (talk) 06:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of SES satellites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SpaceNews. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
JAXA participation in JUICE
editHi, I'd like to comment about one of your recent edit to Template:Japanese space program which I felt there may have been a misunderstanding. JUICE is listed as one of JAXA/ISAS's MoO.(see page3 of the presentation Japan’s Future Space Science Missions in Astronomy and Astrophysics). JAXA will provide hardware for JUICE's RPWI, GALA, and PEP/JNA, along with participation as science Co-I in JANUS, J-MAG (page6 of the document 宇宙科学・探査ロードマップの検討状況について(その2) from JAXA). To be more specific, JAXA will provide the following :
- RPWI(High Frequency Receiver System, DPU software)
- GALA(receiving optics and detector for TRU)
- PEP(electronics for JNA)
JAXA is in charge of integral components for several science instruments, and although there aren't any PIs, there are several Co-PIs from JAXA. What's more, JAXA itself regards JUICE as part of their future science missions, as in this presentation they gave at the National Research Council Space Study Board. I'd say all of this qualify for JUICE to be included in Template:Japanese space program. Kind regards, Hms1103 (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of spacecraft manufacturers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mountain View. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
editPlease do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to XCOR Lynx. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. The current title is per the previous move discussion at Talk:XCOR Lynx/Archive 1#Requested move 28 April 2014 BilCat (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
MTO
editHello, you may have noticed that I reverted your edit introducing a MTO target for a 2017 GPS III launch on Falcon 9. Nonetheless your edit comment about similar Atlas V launches intrigued me: all past GPS launches on that page list MEO as a target and two future GPS launches list MTO. I traced this back to a 2013 edit by VapourNudge that added many future Atlas missions, including those two first launches of the GPS III constellation. Is there something special about the GPS III block that requires a different target orbit from the launcher? Do you have a source explaining this? Even if that were the case, it looks like "medium transfer orbit" is a seldom-used term (59 Google hits, mostly from research papers) so I would advise linking to the main MEO page and explaining MTO there. — JFG talk 12:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Dnepr uses the RS-20B, not the RS-20A.
editDear @I dream of horses:, you've made a correction to the Dnepr (rocket) where you stated flatly, that it was derived from the 15A14 rather than the 15A18. Every source I've seen including Daniel Marin, NASASpaceflight.com, Russian strategic nuclear forces, RIA Novosti, Izvestia, Kap Yar and even there is a whole thread in Novosti Kosmonavtiki state quite clearly that it is derived from the 15A18. What are your sources for stating so flatly against what the specialized industry says is so? — Baldusi (talk) 14:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Right talk page, but you've pinged the wrong person. I wasn't the person who made the specific edit you're talking about, though I did make one about a year and a half ago. PSR B1937+21 is the person you're looking for. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry! Did a quick read on the headers and thought it strange to use two names but didn't understood it was your greeting. – Baldusi (talk) 18:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Dear @PSR B1937+21 and I dream of horses:, please read the first post. I'm undoing your commit and we can discuss it here. If you show me all the relevant documentation against what I have posted, I will gladly restore your commit. – Baldusi (talk) 18:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, PSR B1937+21. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, PSR B1937+21. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, PSR B1937+21. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Same user
editFYI, on Talk:List of missions to the Moon, Rowan Forest and BatteryIncluded is the same person. Rowan Forest is the active account. Kees08 (Talk) 18:41, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
edit Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from SpaceX Dragon into Dragon 2. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editCategory:Falcon rocket launches has been nominated for discussion
editCategory:Falcon rocket launches, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 11:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Category:Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches has been nominated for deletion
editCategory:Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — JFG talk 14:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)