Hi Elise

I am sorry to have caused you offense or distress.

It was an error on my part. I was under the impression that I was removing spurious text from an article. I had not realised at the time that it was a talk page.

You will be pleased to know that the report on the IP address talk page will not be attributed to you user account, so you still have a clean slate.

Also, the post to my talk page was the correct communication method. Thank you.

May I encourage you to be bold and start editing articles, even if it is only to remove graffiti. My advice would be to get started on your own user page. Then, after experimenting in your own private space, you may feel comfortable enough to pick a subject you're comfortable with and see if you can add anything to the articles that relate to the subject. Personally, I found that my love and knowledge of music gave me a subject to get started on.

Have fun.

Regards Richard

Also known as LittleOldMe 14:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Harry Adams (artist)

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Harry Adams (artist), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.l-13.org/acatalog/Harry_Adams.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:46, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Harry Adams (artist), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.l-13.org/acatalog/Harry_Adams.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Harry Adams (artist) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 14:00, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

In particular, the page reads as a close paraphrase of the source which is still a copyright violation. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:00, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of National Art Hate Week

edit
 

The article National Art Hate Week has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NEVENT. Turned out to be nothing consequential, the only independent coverage is the Guardian article cited.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 11:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of National Art Hate Week for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Art Hate Week is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Art Hate Week until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SITH (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply