PaienPaien
Welcome!
editHi PaienPaien! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 19:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
February 2022
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Dimes have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Dimes was changed by PaienPaien (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2022-02-10T18:39:45+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Careful
editWhile it is good to see someone new helping out - and all your other edits so far look good - there is no reason to think this is was a test edit, and it is certainly not vandalism. I don't know what "wikiloop" is, but since editors are responsible for their own edits, I am commenting here, rather than some other website's page. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- My bad, it's like a tool to patrol recent edits, it automatically inserts a default edit summary, and sometimes I forget to change it, I'll be careful from now on. Sorry. PaienPaien (talk) 19:32, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- Fair enough, no worries. I get more worried when I see someone using an anti-vandalism tool too rapidly, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. Mistakes are allowed, no harm done. If you actually disagree with the edit, feel free to revert my re-addition (with an edit summary), but I think it's actually a minor improvement. Anyway, cheers. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)