User talk:Paigebodnar/Folk taxonomy

Peer Review

I think that overall the article is good. There is a good amount of detail, and some good specific examples to help the reader understand folk taxonomy. The article should have a header. Also, I thought that a couple of the sentences were a little akward to read. The amount of sources is good, and the amount of sources used to back up each claim is good. AustinPetryk (talk) 15:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

The article is very strong. It is researched well and provides the information in a very neutral tone. There are many sources and they are all strong and relevant. The paragraphs and heading make the article very easy to follow. Multiple view points on the issue are explained and objections are presented in a neutral manner. ECappBU (talk) 04:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)