Palmsandbeaches

S. S. Agarwal

Don't move long time articles into draft space just because a source is dead. Follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Link rot. I have fixed the dead reference. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Sanjay Saint moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sanjay Saint, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GSS ^💬 18:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for notifying. Will look in to it!

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 03:46, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Hey, GSS ^💬! Your note made me read more on WP:NACADEMIC and I researched more to add few other stuff which I didn't add first. So this doc seem to have more than 30,000 citations on Google Scholar and more than 25,000 at researchagee. I did a quick check and the published work seems to be with relevant journals etc. So it satisfies the criteria 1. He is also the member of American Society for Clinical Investigation through an election. So I wondered if it also fits criteria 3 (even though satisfying criteria 1 should already be enough). So this society ain't very old which questions the prestige. But quick search on Google Scholar throws out a lot of published work - which has been given as a way to measure the relevance of a society.

Even if we ignore criteria 3 and since this subject fulfils criteria 1, do you think it is now ready to be submitted and accepted?

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 04:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Nikhil Sabharwal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikhil Sabharwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikhil Sabharwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SUGAR Cosmetics

Hello Palmsandbeaches,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SUGAR Cosmetics for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 18:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia! However, you should know that it is not a good idea to remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to David Adler (entrepreneur). Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Greyjoy ^talk 09:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey Greyjoy! Thanks for dropping by and letting me know about it. I will be more careful. I usually remove link (or related info) if I feel that those were temporary (maybe even paid) releases to promote a particular page. But like I said, will be more careful for sure! While we are at David Adler (entrepreneur), I even wanted to nominate for AFD but wasn't 100 percent confident. What would you suggest?

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 11:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Removing links because they were paid or promotional is fine, my comment was primarily in the two edits with summaries regarding dead links.

I am guessing that your reasoning behind wanting to AFD it is you believe it does not meet notability requirements? I just had a quick look through the references and some do appear to be brief mentions. I can see how you would be a bit on the fence about nominating it, but in the end it is your call. As long as it is done in good faith I cannot see the harm in nominating an article for AFD, either editors agree and the article is removed or they disagree and it remains, no harm done. My apologies for the delayed response, in future it would be quickest if you ping me so I am notified of your response. Greyjoy ^talk 05:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey, Greyjoy! No need to apologize! Thank you for your detailed and unbiased view on this. Whenever I nominate for AFD, I remain cognizant of the fact that the other editors would have to invest time in that - and hence I feel responsible for it! I guess I will do some more study before I nominate this one! Once again, thanks a ton!

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 03:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Bashar Bizrah moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bashar Bizrah, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Deepak Dhar (producer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepak Dhar (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Dhar (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at Bashar Bizrah

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Bashar Bizrah. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey Robby.is.on! Thanks for this. I also discovered WP:RSP which seems to be a super useful resource! Thanks again! Palmsandbeaches (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Yes, indeed. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 13:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Bashar Bizrah moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bashar Bizrah, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GSS ^💬 09:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

SUGAR Cosmetics moved to draftspace

Recreation of a deleted article by the same user, best get an independent review before moving to mainspace. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 09:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey! How are you doing? I just noticed it and while it is slightly disheartening since recreation was done while in discussion with the nominating editor of deletion; what you are saying still kind of makes sense! Thanks for your time on this!

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 05:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vrikshit Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vrikshit Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMySon 13:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 11:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Far too many of the pages you have created or moved into mainspace are either previous UPE articles, COI articles or recreations of UPE or COI articles. MER-C 11:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey! What just happened! I just saw this and can't believe this! Yes, I have moved a lot of pages from draft space since I was working on this category of pages [1]. My objective was to revise and improve as many drafts as possible and make them available to be read by the users of Wikipedia! While I have been thinking that I have been doing a noble job, I sort of can't believe this has been done!

The other category that I worked extensively on was [2] - where I extensively removed unsourced info and improved drafts! I am shocked that after such constructive editing for so long (which includes nominating pages for deletions and having a great track record there too), I am seeing this.

In fact, just today I was learning how to use twinkle and exploring further to do more work! I hope you see that your judgment here is slightly misguided and revert your action! Thanks for your time on this!

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 12:37, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

This isn't convincing at all. Why did you choose to write about Sanjay Saint, SUGAR Cosmetics (twice) and Bashar Bizrah? After paying closer attention to some of the other articles you have created, I am now certain that this is UPE and therefore oppose an unblock. MER-C 16:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

I found all of them in the requested articles section. SUGAR Cosmetics was created again after consulting with the deleting administrator who confirmed that it was marginally notable and I could create it again. Nonetheless, all I wanted to do was use my time to do something useful during my sabbatical before I go for my masters in public health. I still think I learned a lot of new things and did something good. You have a blessed day ahead and I express my gratitude and thank you for all you do here on this platform! I will sign off! Sayonara!

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 05:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Palmsandbeaches (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked because I moved many drafts to mainspace that have COI/UPE history. When I started, I wondered how contribute constructively and started improving pages that had notability issues. I usually found them here [3]. It was a great learning exercise and I either improved articles and removed the notability tag or I proposed them for deletion. I think out of 30 pages I nominated, only 2-3 were kept/merged. Rest were all successful deletions.

After that, I realized I can do more constructive editing by improving pages that are in drafts and hence have potential and move them to main space. This was also great and I felt I was doing a good job. In between, I created/edited articles on topics that I think were worthy/notable. Honestly, I never even checked if they were moved because of COI/UPE reasons! A lot many of them were also simply moved because they lack sources etc.

Then I started improving articles that were tagged as paid - removing unsourced info, improving neutrality etc - which, again I thought was very construvtive. I can't understand why working on many such articles, improving them would award me a block. However, if that is a problem indeed - I will not edit such pages and find other ways to continue contributing constructively. Thanks!

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 12:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you explain this? All these people are on the same IP address as you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:37, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey, I am not sure how this tool works - but I keep moving and edit from various places (my home, various cafes I go, sometimes airports etc) and even use my phone internet sometimes. Hence, a lot of times I am using internet connections that are public connection or my phone hotspot connections that show common network IP I think.

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 15:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

I took a look at this via the tool as well. There seems to be more to this than just "on the same IP". There seems to be significant overlap in what device is used as well. SQL^{Query me!} 23:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey, like I said, don't know how this tool works! Like mentioned before, I wanted to do something useful of my time and learn new things - which I did. I will sign off now! Best wishes to you folks here.

Palmsandbeaches (talk) 05:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Art Alive Art Gallery

The article Art Alive Art Gallery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NCORP fail

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --- Possibly (talk) 18:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Art Alive Art Gallery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Art Alive Art Gallery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Alive Art Gallery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--- Possibly (talk) 02:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sanjay Saint

Hello, Palmsandbeaches. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sanjay Saint, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sanjay Saint

Hello, Palmsandbeaches. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sanjay Saint".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:13, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bashar Bizrah

Hello, Palmsandbeaches. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bashar Bizrah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terry Williams (sociologist) has been accepted

Terry Williams (sociologist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 01:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:SUGAR Cosmetics

Hello, Palmsandbeaches. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SUGAR Cosmetics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Vrikshit Foundation

Hello, Palmsandbeaches. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vrikshit Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)