300 Edits

edit

As you are a new user, I am sure you have a great many questions about the editing process. In the 300 article, it is usually good to read the sources that someon is citing in the edit summaries. If you have concerns after that, it is usually good to bring those concerns to the Discussion Page of the article, so that they can be addressed in a clear manner without an edit-war starting up. If I can help you with this process in any way, please feel free to drop me a line on my user talk page. Arcayne (cast a spell) 23:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

arbcom case

edit

you are added to this arbcom case [1]--Dacy69 04:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unblocked

edit

After E-mail exchange with Behmod, VoA and maniF I have reasons to believe that you and Pam55 are different people (see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pam55). Thus, I am unblocking you. Still as you and Pam55 are friends in real life and obviously discuss Wiki matters in real life please take care that your work was not seen as Meatpuppeting. Never make edits because you were asked to do it, avoid !voting together in the same discussion, avoid participation in the edit wars together. Happy editing Alex Bakharev 04:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 16:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unblocked

edit

Hi Pam. You've been unblocked now, so you should be free to edit what you like. Thanks - Alison 00:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 Closed

edit

The above named arbitration case in which you were named as a party has closed. The remedy is as follows: The remedies of revert limitations (formerly revert parole), including the limitation of 1 revert per week, civility supervision (formerly civility parole) and supervised editing (formerly probation) that were put in place at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan shall apply to any editor who edits articles which relate to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility. Before any penalty is applied, a warning placed on the editor's user talk page by an administrator shall serve as notice to the user that these remedies apply to them.

You may view the full case decisions here.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 00:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply