Pandoramelly
Welcome!
editHello, Pandoramelly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Frederick Tibbenham, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 21:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Frederick Tibbenham for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederick Tibbenham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick Tibbenham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
I have done some work to strengthen this article, as promised in answer to your Help Desk query. It's still weak in terms of biography, though. I've had a brief look at some of the stuff on the Facebook page (can't link to that from Wikipedia articles, I'm afraid) but you haven't put links to the source. What would be useful would be images we can use - do you have any you've taken yourself? - and some more biographical details of Tibbenham himself. Regards, Karenjc 20:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
The rewrite is a million times better. Thank you very much. I could upload some images if I knew how to, but the problem is, quite a lot of the supporting information is either in private collections (i,e, Daily Mail archives) to which the public have no access/right of use, or undated cuttings, so probably very difficult to have accepted as of any real substance.
I'll ask for permission for the pictures that I do have, and add them as soon as it's been OK'd. Again, thank you very much for your amazing work.
NB The house is currently suffering flooding from an unknown source, which I think is an attempt to demolish it, and this article is part of its preservation.
All good wishes,
Pandora Pandoramelly (talk) 20:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)