Pankycont

Pankycont, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pankycont! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Peter Handke

Hi. There was absolutely some valuable stuff in your addition to the Handke article, but overall I thought it was too utflytende, too much focus on recent stuff and a bit too focused on sources positive to Handke. Since I couldn't be bothered to sort the good from the bad I simply reverted it all. I know it wasn't an optimal solution. You may have noticed that I filed a puppet investigation. Have you ever considered writing for Wikinews/Wikinytt? They need people and would welcome stuff like the Handke controversy and so on. In a biographical article, exstensive focus on one controversy or incident easily gets undue, but in news article it would be very fine. Your writing style may be more suitable for news reporting than for an encyclopedia where the language is required to be very dry and toned-down. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 16:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello again. If you want to, you may send me an e-mail via the internal Wikistystem, so we can discuss what kind of thoughts you have about editing Wikipedia and if there is a better way forward than the current sitation. Iselilja (talk) 18:57, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

I am looking forward to hearing from you regarding the subject of Peter Handke, on the article's talk page. --Pankycont (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

"For many", rather than "for some"

In a recent edit remark, I wrote "Speaking at the funeral of an accused war criminal is obviously controversial for some".

I meant to write "controversial for many". --Pankycont (talk) 09:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)