User talk:PantherLeapord/Archives/2013/August

Talkback

Hello, PantherLeapord. You have new messages at User:Jackson Peebles/Adoption/PantherLeapord Final.
Message added 06:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You've been doing great work so far, and I'd love for you to keep it up! Please let me know if you have any questions, but I'd prefer to move forward when possible! Jackson Peebles (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

CSD

Hi, I changed the CSD criteria on Emad Faghot to G10, as I see it as an attack page. Thanks, Matty.007 09:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough (I was tempted to do the same myself!) PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 09:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, PantherLeapord. You have new messages at Jackson Peebles's talk page.
Message added 00:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jackson Peebles (talk) 00:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

That crazy IP

I'm going to revert him again on Shake Weight, but I worry about blocks for edit warring. Sometimes they just get handed out across the board if the admin is unobservant, and the record is mighty hard to expunge, so take care, brudda. Jusdafax 11:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

WP:3RR specifies that there are exceptions for reverting blatant vandalism and the blocking admin agrees that it was vandalism so AFAIK there is no danger on that front. PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 11:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

In any case he's been blocked for a week, which is really light in my view. I am tempted to ask for an extension somewhere, but anyway, thanks! Jusdafax 11:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

No worries. The admins are usually generous with shared IP's as they want to minimize collateral damage which is reasonable enough. Although if that IP resumes the edit war then they'll probably be staring down the barrel of months of blocked time... PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 11:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

3RR at Swaminarayan

I came very, very close to blocking you for your reverts at Swaminarayan - I counted 5 in the space of a couple of hours but for now I'm going to assume good faith and give you the benefit of the doubt. Although I'd agree that the edits at Shake Weight are blatant vandalism and so fall under one of the 3RR exceptions the edit to this page are not, nor do they full under any of the other exceptions. As such you have broken 3RR and could be blocked, but as I believe you may have misunderstood what constitutes an exception to 3RR I'm not going to at this time. Please be more careful, and seek admin help in future, rather than continuing to revert as you did here. Dpmuk (talk) 16:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Despite my warning above that this was not a valid exception to 3RR you still went ahead and reverted again. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Dpmuk (talk) 22:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PantherLeapord/Archives/2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to apologize for my disruptive edit warring earlier (Ether today or yesterday depending on which timezone you are in!) and I can promise that it will not be happening again. PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 02:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The block has expired. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I normally like to let a different admin deal with unblock requests where I did the block so as to allow a second opinion. However as no one else has been along yet I will comment here. In general we like to see an explanation of your understanding of why what you did was wrong as well as an undertaking not to do it gain as if a user doesn't understand why their actions were against wikipedia policy then we can't be sure they won't do it again. Dpmuk (talk) 21:24, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Considering the block has already expired it's kind of a moot point by now anyway PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 22:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User talk:Apteva. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. This is just about the most pointless edit was I have ever seen. It makes no difference either way, so why fight about it? Beeblebrox (talk) 15:52, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Administrative Actions and Practical

Hey, I was just looking through some of the administrative actions, above, and I just wanted to remind you that you can always approach me or another editor for help if you're in a multi-reversion situation and that you can report the user to AIV. I'm sure you've already had quite enough lecturing, so I'll stop at that, just know that we're here to help.

Finally, remember you ONLY have the practical left. Considering how much work that you've done, it shouldn't be a problem for you, at all. I want you to graduate! --Jackson Peebles (talk) 14:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

I am just waiting for another RfA... PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 21:20, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, PantherLeapord. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Bot requests.
Message added 14:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hasteur (talk) 14:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations on graduating

Congratulations on graduation from my adopt-a-user course! I consider it to be the most rigorous on Wikipedia, and I really am proud of the work that you've done. Please keep it in mind in your edits on Wikipedia. You're listed permanently at my adoption center as a graduate, and here are some awards to go along with it:

		The Adoptee Graduation Diploma
		Congratulations on completing all components of the Adoption/Education Course of Jackson Peebles successfully. This is a testament to enhancement of your knowledge of Wikipedia and serves as evidence of completion of a Mentorship or a strong dedication to helping the project. This course has covered both theoretical concepts and practical applications. I am proud to confer this diploma upon you. --Jackson Peebles (talk) 19:52, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 23:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar for Jackson

Wow, that was very nice of you to make that barnstar for Jackson. What a really great idea. I agree with you that he is a great mentor and happy that you took the time to give him a thumbs up. Good job!! Oh and congrats on doing so well on your exams in the adoption program too. You are an incentive to me to do the best I can on my exams. Thank you!! Tattoodwaitress (talk) 14:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

D'aww thanks! PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 22:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

User talk response on Homewrecker ANI

I've responded to your notice on my talk page. Thank you. Dovid (talk) 13:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)