Parliamentary Funk

Hi Parliamentary Funk, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of Contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
• Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

• Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
• The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

• Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
• If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log.

Good luck, and have fun. --- Jeeny ^(talk) 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Better late than never. Welcome! - Jeeny ^(talk) 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

RE: Japanese red army vid link - why did you remove it?

How is this youtube video "pertinent to the article"? It does not appear to be, and therefore goes against our external links policy. See WP:YOUTUBE. Also, don't forget to sign your comments. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:38, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I did watch the video. I strongly disagree that the video adds any encyclopedic value to the article, however, feel free to re-add it and I will not remove it again. If another editor feels it is unnecessary, then they will remove it. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I've gotten a second opinion about the link, and have decided to remove it again. Being a possible copyright violation, not being an reliable source, and per WP:V is reason enough to remove it at this time. Also, see our policy on external links to avoid further problems with your contributions. Thanks, Rjd0060 (talk) 06:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Just wanted to add, his second opinion was asked of me, but I was overruled, rightly so. I said I liked it and agreed that it added value, but it was a problem because it was not in English. You can see my talk page of the convo about this link. - Jeeny ^(talk) 00:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Rjd0060. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff.. Actually, see the same section that you commented in. I did get an opinion from another editor, you just failed to see it. Rjd0060 00:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Sure you did, kemosabe. I've put this issue on the table so OTHER EXISTING editors can put in an opinion.00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Great! I'm glad you decided to use the resources available here. I've left a comment also. - Rjd0060 00:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)