Parmenides64

Reverts and reasons

You can "think" that there are no reasons for a revert, but in that case you should look at the edit summary, the lead should be a summary of the article and "parents" or "descendants" of boxing are not covered - nor supported by sources - therein (so it is also inappropriate for the infobox) + the other terms are not common enough alternatives for them to be bolded + revert one non-improvement a bit lower (too verbose), which gives all the reasons why this material is not appropriate for inclusion at this time. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 18:21, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop reverting. See WP:BRD. You need to get consensus for your changes before implementing them if they have been challenged... Repeatedly reverting is edit-warring, which is usually frowned upon. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)