Partey Lover

Welcome!

Hi Partey Lover! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 07:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks re my nonGold mistake (Mission Continues)

Something seemed odd when I looked at the post (mis)edit window. Thanks. The Goldman Sachs donation was something I had planned on doing yesterday but got delayed/distracted. Once again, thanks. Nuts240 (talk) 02:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

No problem, I'm newer to editing so I wasn't positive if it was vandalism because your account looked pretty legit, thanks for the message. Partey Lover (talk) 03:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at TARDIS, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. C F A 💬 03:20, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Are citations necessary for every single sentence and paragraph in a page? Genuine question, I am a new wikipedia editor. I wasn't the one who made the original edit, but I saw you rolled it back, and I thought it was a relevant piece of info. There are other pieces of information that do not have a cited source on the same page. Partey Lover (talk) 03:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! The answer is generally yes. Editors should be able to find out where the information came from and if it is true easily with a citation. They are much more important in biographies of living people, but yes, you should aim for at least one citation that backs up the information per paragraph on any page. There are some exceptions, like for plot summaries, but most additions do require citations. Happy editing, C F A 💬 03:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Quick question

Did you intend to undo Cluebot here? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

I meant to undo the change Cluebot already made, and accidently re-added the vandalism, sorry bro bro Partey Lover (talk) 04:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Not a problem; just checking. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Question 8/9

Is there a reason you marked my edit to my own passed company as vandalism? I've been updating it to be current IWF Promotions and my first champion is running for congress & is fully ware of this update. Halbeisen80023 (talk) 06:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I marked the edit as vandalism because it looked like out of place self advertising. From my knowledge, a wikipedia page is only supposed to have information relevant to the organization or person listed, and usually should not be edited by the persons being referenced in the page itself. With that being said, I am new to editing, and I am not 100% positive on this; or the general policy on self advertising. There is a possibility I was incorrect in removing it. Best of luck to you on your campaign. Partey Lover (talk) 06:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

I have so many people listed on that page as I was a pro wrestling promoter for years. So there are endless people to reference from passed to present. I just haven't look at this page in years & a few people had asked me to try & update it. No problems at all, maybe in the future please be cautious as my user name reflects the page in reference on said page just a little reading could have solved confusion. Not my campaign but I do wish him the best as well. Again thank you & no harm done and after so long maybe I need to read up on new policies myself. Take care. Halbeisen80023 (talk) 06:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Marking revisions as "vandalism"

Hello Partey Lover,

I really appreciate your work on reverting bad faith edits. Keep it up!

I would like to let you know that on Twinkle, the vandalism feature is intentionally used for quick reverting vandalism.

However, I understand that you are a new contributor with 300+ edits in 5 days.

However, if its not vandalism (like mass removal of content, only once), I would recommend using the "rollback" feature, or if the edit is good faith, I would recommend using the "rollback (AGF)" feature.

Both of those features have optional edit summaries, not required.

Addition to that, it does not mean you did anything wrong with your editing, but I would recommend taking a look at the WP:MEATBOT policy and take it slowly, also reading the diffs before making reverts, since its just the speed of your contributions of reverting and notifying the user on their talk page.

If I misunderstood, I would appreciate if you would let me know.

I'm just only letting you know about some tips and tricks about reverting edits, that's all.

Thanks and keep going!

PEPSI697 (talk) 06:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the message, I was only using the vandalism button instead of the rollback feature because I assumed they did the same exact thing, I'll start putting reasons from now on Partey Lover (talk) 06:58, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

No worries, we never know if they will keep adding the same content back or not. In edit summaries, you don't always need to provide a reason when reverting bad faith edits. Again, keep going!PEPSI697 (talk) 07:03, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of X64dbg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article X64dbg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X64dbg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 10:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi

hi you are so beautiful i love you. Please marry me im so gay. 5.211.135.205 (talk) 05:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Im a super nice guy

Hi i love you 5.211.135.205 (talk) 05:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

So generous! Partey Lover (talk) 05:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)