Patagonian
+
cafe odeon
editthank you for your contributions to the article on gay bars, but your assertion about cafe odeon is inaccurate. while the term 'gay bar' is decidedly very loosely defined, odeon certainly falls within the definition. one only need execute a cursory internet search to bear that out. thanks for your cooperation in not continuing to revert valid content. --emerson7 22:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
I know the Cafe's owners and after i told them about the current wikipedia conflict about the cafe they become indisposed about this. How can you easily categorize this "old" cool cafe as a Gay Bar?--Patagonian (talk) 12:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
May 2012
edit
Your recent editing history at Gay Bar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. emerson7 00:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)