January 2009

edit

  Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Jellymon worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 12:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jellymon, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please create your own article. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 12:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

You have a new message on my talkpage. E Wing (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jellymon (studio)

edit
 

The article Jellymon (studio) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article looks like advertising, and does not meet WP:CORP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wilstrup (talk) 02:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Jellymon (studio)

edit

I have nominated Jellymon (studio), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jellymon (studio). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wilstrup (talk) 13:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply