Paulboll

Welcome!

Hello, Paulboll, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome!

1bandsaw (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Frederick Woodward Branson.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Frederick Woodward Branson.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Frederick Woodward Branson.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Frederick Woodward Branson.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Frederick Woodward Branson.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Frederick Woodward Branson.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 9 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Frederick Woodward Branson page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the Reynolds and Branson page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

Hi Could you help please.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Woodward_Branson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_and_Branson

I have add two photo, From the leeds library, they have give me permission to you the images if i site them as source, which i have do, i also add the permission.

Photo title = Reynolds & Branson Limited 13 -13 Briggate Leeds LS1 6DL, photo taken 1933 Copyright of Leeds Library and Information Service www.leodis.net

Photo title = Reynolds & Branson Limited 13 -13 Briggate Leeds LS1 6DL, The shop is on the right by the parked car, photo taken 1933 Copyright of Leeds Library and Information Service www.leodis.net

not sure what else i can do ?

Email granting permission from the Assistant Librarian-Manager Leeds library to use the images.

Forwarded message ----------

From: Images <Images@leeds.gov.uk> Date: 26 July 2016 at 14:29 Subject: RE: Reynolds & Branson LTD of Leeds, You have two photos of my family business, To: "paulbollands@googlemail.com" <paulbollands@googlemail.com>

Hi Paul

Thanks for providing us with that link to the Wikipedia articles – I think we’ll print them off and get them added to our stock, if that’s OK!

I’m really pleased you’ve managed to find some images of your family’s business on Leodis – you can actually just download/copy the images from the website for using on Wikipedia without any payment, provided you credit them as being copyright of “Leeds Library and Information Service, www.leodis.net”.

If you want to order printed copies for yourself, you can do that via the Leodis site.

Kind regards

Antony Ramm

Assistant Librarian-Manager

Local and Family History

Central Library

Leeds

Please help me with...

Paulboll (talk) 08:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I think User:AntiCompositeNumber will be able to help you out here. Thanks VarunFEB2003 ^{I am Offline} 10:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Someone summoned me? Well hello then! I've taken the time to look through the images you uploaded, and some of them have a few problems. Some of these images may be in the public domain, some may be able to be freely licensed, and some may be non-free. To determine which images fit into each category, we need you to help provide additional information.

First, it looks like you uploaded some images from family photo albums that were not distributed to the public in any way. In this case there are three likely options: 1. You took the original images, and are the rights holder because you are the author; 2. The original images were given to you; or 3. Someone else (likely a family member) owns the copyright to the images. If it is 1. or 2. there is no issue with licensing of those images. If number 3 is the case, there is some work to do.

Some of the images have were listed as being previously published. In order to determine their copyright status, we need to know where and when they were published. Many of these images would be in the public domain if they were published, but would not be if they weren't published before 1943.

Leodis
File:Reynolds and Branson 13 Briggate, in Leeds, England from 1884 to 1972jpg.jpg File:Frederick Woodward Business Premises 1933.jpg

For the images from Leodis, we need to know when they were first published. If they were from somebody's private collections, and weren't made available to the public, then the images are non-free. If they were published (made available to the public at large) prior to 1943, they are public domain.

In Short

1. Who owns the rights to the images from the photo albums?
2. Where were the "Previously published" items published?
3. Where and when were the Leodis images published, if they ever were?

Once these questions are answered, I can continue to help sort this out. If you have any questions or need any help, you can ping me, leave a message on my talk page, or ask at the Media Copyright Questions page AntiCompositeNumber is on vacation. (Leave a message) 00:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

This was my first time at adding photos all taken from my family album

Photo Album? ( it option 2. The original images were given to you )

File:Frederick Hartridge Branson.jpg

File:Rose Mary Ellen Branson Nee Hartridge.jpg File:Vicky Bollands GGG father taken from album.jpg File:Frederick Norman Branson.jpg File:Reynolds & Branson Limited Leeds High Street 1900.jpg File:Frederick Hartridge Branson at his family home photo taken 1948.jpg File:Muriel Virginia Carey Orchard.jpg File:Patricia Audrey Grant wife of Peter Branson.jpg File:Eileen C Director of Reynolds & Branson.jpg File:Frederick Norman Branson part1 .jpg File:Frederick Hartridge Branson.jpg File:Grange over sands Frederick Hartridge Brason House circa 1940s.jpg File:Richard Arthur Branson.jpg File:Peter O Branson Director Reynolds and Branson.jpg File:Frederick Hartridge Branson later in life.jpg File:Frederick Hartridge wife Muriel and theres son Frederick Norman.jpg

These are also part of Photo Album? ( it option 2. The original images were given to you ) I incorrectly listed them Previously published?

File:Patricia Audrey Grant wife of Peter Branson.jpg

File:Frederick Woodward Branson.jpg File:Frederick Hartridge Branson House 1910 3 Tolbert Avenue Roundhay Leeds.jpg File:Frederick Woodward Branson Freedom City Of London.jpg File:Peter Branson aged 100 25th july 2016 Former Director of Reynolds & Branson.jpg File:Frederick Norman Branson house in thorner 1950s.jpg

Ill contact Leodis

   For the images from Leodis, we need to know when they were first published. If they were from somebody's private collections, and weren't made available to the public, then the images are non-free. If they were published (made available to the public at large) prior to 1943, they are public domain.

   In Short

       Who owns the rights to the images from the photo albums?
       Where were the "Previously published" items published?
       Where and when were the Leodis images published, if they ever were?

   Once these questions are answered, I can continue to help sort this out. If you have any questions or need any help, you can ping me, leave a message on my talk page, or ask at the Media Copyright Questions page AntiCompositeNumber is on vacation. (Leave a message) 00:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC) 

I have two images from the leeds library, the Licensing needs to be created similar to

Palace of Westminster page, not sure how to do this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Royal_Robing_Room,_Palace_of_Westminster.jpg

Please help me with...

Paulboll (talk) 08:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

The listed image uses {{Non-free Parliamentary copyright}}, which should be according to Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. I'm not sure under which copyright license the Leeds images fall, so you need to find the proper template (as the one I provided is for Parliamentary images). See Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright tags for the appropriate tag. If your images qualify for non-free use, then you can upload them to the English Wikipedia (not Commons), to use in the article. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 10:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Frederick Woodward Branson

I commented on the media copyright requests page, that I thought there were issues with the Frederick Woodward Branson article. First, let me thank you for your contributions on this & other pages - they're much appreciated. As my time is short, let me be blunt but also let me apologise for being so - I don't mean to discourage you in any way. I think there's a very good article and very good wikipedia editor to be had out of this situation.

Let me point you at WP:COI which is there, amongst other things, to mitigate against articles being written by people with a connection with the subject, who may be more interested in the subject than in the norms of the encyclopedia. In my head, you fall into this category and, in combination with you being fairly new to wikipedia, have as a result produced an article about an undoubtedly notable person which has all sorts of red flag issues. They include:

• Way too many images. Visit, I don't know, Winston Churchill or some other well photographed figure of history. Note the ratio of text to images. You have disgorged pretty much the whole family album onto the subject page - headshots of diverse members of an extended family, family group photos, their houses. Really, we lack only a cute picture of Fido the dog to complete it all.
• Many/most of the images do not pertain to the subject
• Pretty much no image caption on wikipedia has a copyright statement in it. All of yours do. Why?
• Why have we a huge history of Reynolds & Branson, going on for several sections. (I see you are working on a Reynolds & Branson article: presumably all of the R&B stuff in FWB will be moved there?
• "The Life And Times Of Frederick W. Branson And His Family". No. "Biography", or "Life". And remember the article is about him, not his family, else it would be an article entitled "Frederick W. Branson and his Family". (And sections headings are sentence case, not Initial Letter Case)
• Why is the biog on single huge paragraph?
• It's doubtful we need an extended treatise on radium in the FWB article.
• Why are you trying to find, in the media copyright page, ways of supporting two frankly poor images of streetfronts and shop signs. If the images were of any quality, they might be worth fighting for. As it is, I really don't think they lend any more to the article than, say, the house images.

To conclude: I think there are some great sections in the FWB article, and I appreciate your use of citations. Yours is a far better effort than I ever made when I was a couple of months into wikipedia editing. However I think there's considerable scope for improvement, not least to get this article to look and feel like other wikipedia biographies. hth --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

If I get time I will. Don't be discouraged. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Frederick Woodward Business Premises 1933.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frederick Woodward Business Premises 1933.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Reynolds and Branson 13 Briggate, in Leeds, England from 1884 to 1972jpg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reynolds and Branson 13 Briggate, in Leeds, England from 1884 to 1972jpg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 October 16 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 16:10, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paulboll. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

This might help you....

Wikipedia:Article wizard Lectonar (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: K.R.Ali Taekwondo Academy (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K.R.Ali Taekwondo Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: K.R.Ali Taekwondo Academy (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K.R.Ali Taekwondo Academy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Paulboll. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:K.R.Ali Taekwondo Academy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:K.R.Ali Taekwondo Academy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:K.R.Ali Taekwondo Academy

Hello, Paulboll. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "K.R.Ali Taekwondo Academy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)