Paxillus

Proposed deletion of Chemical postevolution

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chemical postevolution, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Per WP:NEO#Articles on neologisms -- obscure protoneologism (no GoogleBooks hits, only 6 GoogleScholar hits)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 03:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chemical postevolution

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chemical postevolution, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemical postevolution. Thank you. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 12:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chemical postevolution has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 13:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Chemical postevolution. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 14:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

		Your Opinion is More Important than You Think Barnstar
		Hello, Ikip/t, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like wikipedia and decide to stay. I am sorry that there are so many impersonal warning messages on your talk page. There are many editors who feel that your hard work here is important and valuable, especially me. Need help? If you are looking for help, you can just type: {{helpme}} ...and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Or, please visit New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! If you have any questions at all, please message me. Again, welcome! Ikip (talk) 17:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created: Chemical postevolution may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemical postevolution.

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for Chemical postevolution: google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.

2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)

3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.

4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 17:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Chemical postevolution

You might consider adding some appropriate links to this article in, for example, articles on Drug Design and also adding it to some appropriate categories, but do not over do it. I hope you do not mind me reformatting your AfD comments to fit the normal style of AfD. --Bduke (Discussion) 22:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

No I don´t mind, unless you dont change the content. (Paxillus (talk) 17:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC))