User talk:Pbritti/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, Pbritti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Edison (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

W&M userbox

Hi Pbritti. Just wondering why you created User:Pbritti/Userboxes/Coll Will Mary when {{user WM}} already existed? 67.176.1.108 (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

@67.176.1.108: I was unaware of the existence of {{user WM}} (I'm fairly new to this whole thing), and decided to give it a whirl. Thanks for letting me know. If you think it prudent, I will delete User:Pbritti/Userboxes/Coll Will Mary and revert to the previously established userbox. Pbritti (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

I think for this duplication, it makes sense to delete User:Pbritti/Userboxes/Coll Will Mary. If you want to do it speedily, you can add the tag {{userreq}} to the top, since you created it. Thank you! 67.176.1.108 (talk) 03:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

@67.176.1.108: Done! Pbritti (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UK Defence Journal (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UK Defence Journal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:UK Defence Journal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Pbritti! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:41, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colorado Coalfield War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Hayes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks!

I'm really pleased to see the work you've done on the Colorado Coalfield War. My own small involvement in documenting that era in southern Colorado was just to create the article for Delagua, Colorado some time ago, including links to the various conflicts and disasters there. Best wishes! Kestenbaum (talk) 02:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

@Kestenbaum: Thank you! I'm sure I've run into more of your work elsewhere, but I greatly appreciate anything you have done to further the collective knowledge available on an area that is near-and-dear to me. If you ever see something worthy of concern, never hesitate to ask or rectify, as I'm absolutely new to all this. My newest addition is the Patrick J. Hamrock page on the National Guard Major who was in charge at the time of the Massacre, and I'm still trying to iron out the kinks on that article before linking it on other pages. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:03, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Colorado Coalfield War

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Colorado Coalfield War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 01:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

@Eddie891: Thanks! ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:45, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!

Hello, Pbritti/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, and come to the Project talk page, where you can join in our discussions about Catholic-related articles. We can always use help with the project itself, and on main project pages such as Catholic Church which are sometimes subject to vandalism and poor content changes. Feel free to discuss anything on the project, but please remember to sign all your comments, and help us to make all of the many Catholicism-related articles much better. Again, welcome, and happy editing! CalderUK (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Calder

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lone Tree, Colorado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Schwab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: completed. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Colorado Coalfield War

The article Colorado Coalfield War you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Colorado Coalfield War for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Colorado Coalfield War

The article Colorado Coalfield War you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Colorado Coalfield War for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 20:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Supernatural

Hi Pbritti; Super is a word, and natural is a word. However, supernatural is one word. I see that you quoted someone else, for that, so I'll leave it. It just looks really wrong. Have a good day. GunnisonMarmot (talk) 19:43, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey, GunnisonMarmot! Normally, I would totally agree. However, for the sake of accuracy and considering its citation in news outlets including the improper verbiage, I wanted to maintain it as two separate words. Perhaps I’ll add a “[‘’sic’’]” to denote the incorrect phrasing. Also, you’ve done a magnificent job on the pandemic page for Colorado and greatly appreciate the encyclopedic coverage you’ve provided thus far! ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Colorado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopal Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Pbritti! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:03, Friday, April 24, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

File:By PEHart - Western Bluebird, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=49204036

Bluebird

Past or Present

Note: the bracketed message was originally left on my user page by GunnisonMarmot and I just wanted to move it here for the sake of keeping track—[On COVID Colorado you asked about past or present. If it is yet to happen or happening on the day of the story, I believe the present should be used. If it has happened on the day of the story, or in the past; past is fine. My two cents. Current event, so it is happening.]

Concerning Colorado COVID-19 edits and additions. Some of the information hasn't happened yet since this is an ongoing story, therefore, I believe sometimes past, sometimes present, and sometimes even future, to read as the day they are added or the article they are pointing to. Does this help answer your question? And, what do you think?GunnisonMarmot (talk) 05:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

I totally agree with your assessment then. You’ve done a great job keeping the page up to date and really have appreciated seeing this page be one of the better-managed covering the pandemic. I think I’ll just follow your lead and copy-edit on occasion. Please feel free to revert if you feel like my edits change the spirit of what you’re aiming for, as I feel the page is heading in a really good direction and handling the subject matter appropriately. Thanks again! ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:40, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

You're kind, and your edits are well thought out, and often wonderful. I hope you keep adding new news. You find things and see things that I don't. I did find this, about using the historical present. That supports that point of view. And, a few other things that support writing all timelines in the past. The conversation on this page supports both points of view, depending on the editor. past or present for timelines. It doesn't look like they have settled on a way to do it all the time yet, either. ;) So, I think it depends on the editor, and as long as it isn't terrible, we can leave it. Fixing things to sound better is why wiki works, please keep doing so. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_present I'm very new at this, as well. I've certainly made my mistakes, and surely will have more mistakes in the future.GunnisonMarmot (talk) 08:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Ah, glad I'm not the only fairly new guy here. Admittedly, grammar has never been my strong-suit. If you have any questions about my editing, feel free to stop by here and add to this conversation! Best ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

A Bluebird for Happiness I'm glad you're working on a page in wiki with me. GunnisonMarmot (talk) 01:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colorado National Guard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hogback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pbritti! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Personal help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar

		COVID-19 Barnstar
		message GunnisonMarmot (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, for everything you do everywhere on Wiki, but especially for your additions to the Colorado Covid page. I want to give you two of these because your also an inspiration in kindness and co-operation.

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		message GunnisonMarmot (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

GunnisonMarmot (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so very much, GunnisonMarmot! I hope you have been enjoying your time here! Have a wonderful day! ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 15:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Colorado Coalfield War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pinkerton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anglican Use, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divine Office.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)