Pcfernandez324
Welcome!
editHello, Pcfernandez324, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
editHi, Pcfernandez324 -- welcome to Wikipedia! As Ian mentioned, the Teahouse is a great resource for new editors. But did you know that Wikipedia also has an extensive help library for common questions? Of course, if you run into a question or problem, you're always welcome to get in touch with me either by email or on my talk page. Happy editing! Fraudoktorkatie (talk) 14:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
editHello!
Before reading this, I had a pretty knowledgeable background about sudden unexpected death syndrome but reading this gave me a more detailed history on the subject. I really like how you kept a neutral position throughout your draft. You do a good job of reporting facts and statistics without sounding too much like a robot. I like how you focused on the folk beliefs as well to give a different perspective on this medical focused aspect. I would consider removing or replacing some of your transitional words. For example, in the beginning of your causes section, I didn’t think the first word was really needed. It kind of got in the way of the flow of your article. If you tweaked this and other transitions, it will help the continuity of your information. Also the article’s lead section could use citations in order to follow Wikipedia’s content policies and it would help increase your article’s credibility. Probably the most important thing you could improve are the amount of sources, especially in the article lead. It’s not like you’re lacking a ton of sources but definitely finding more sources will broaden your information. Your article gave me the idea to focus on geographical areas and different races for forensic identification.