Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Peisapooran, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! All is One (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dear MaterialScientist, I have only used one account and the accusation is false. Regards

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peisapooran (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear MaterialScientist, I have only used one account and the accusation is false. Regards

Decline reason:

Checkuser verifies you are not being truthful. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


There is a wikipeida user name Muboshgu, who has multiple accounts, the other account is named Jack Merridew. this individual has had these accounts for a long time. I suspected that he has multiple accounts. Then he falsely reports me of multiple accounts and vandalism just becuase he disagrees with the picture that I put for Diane Kruger web page because I know by heart that this picture that I chose is more beautiful and resemblance of Diane Kruger. All I have been trying to do is help here, and this Muboshgu and his false accounts and perhaps some friends have falsely reported me. What should I do? {{helpme}}

There is a wikipeida user name Muboshgu, who has multiple accounts, the other account is named Jack Merridew. this individual has had these accounts for a long time. I suspected that he has multiple accounts. Then he falsely reports me of multiple accounts and vandalism just becuase he disagrees with the picture that I put for Diane Kruger web page because I know by heart that this picture that I chose is more beautiful and resemblance of Diane Kruger. All I have been trying to do is help here, and this Muboshgu and his false accounts and perhaps some friends have falsely reported me. What should I do?

You cannot do anything, other than requesting an unblock, because you are blocked from editing. Chzz  ►  03:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


Removed one old unblock request


The wikipedia Muboshgu and Jack Merridew are the same account. Even though their account is old, it was the same person that created and operates it. This user is falsely accusing me of vandalism because he disagrees with my opinion. I need help.

The wikipedia Muboshgu and Jack Merridew are the same account. Even though their account is old, it was the same person that created and operates it. This user is falsely accusing me of vandalism because he disagrees with my opinion. I need help.

A check user has already verified that the above story is a lie. Please quit pinging the IRC channel with the {{helpme}}. It's painfully obvious that you are a sock puppeteer (see: user talk:Hwoltzen, where you posted the same sob story you did above.) --ANowlin: talk 03:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peisapooran (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The wikipedia Muboshgu and Jack Merridew are the same account. Even though their account is old, it was the same person that created and operates it. This user is falsely accusing me of vandalism because he disagrees with my opinion. I need help.

Decline reason:

Per comment below. Buh-bye!!!! Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks, Jack Merridew 06:52, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Next admin should indef this fellow and lock both talk pages. (user:Hwoltzen, too) Bub-bye. Jack Merridew 03:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I concur. --Muboshgu (talk) 03:41, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I concur as well. Consider your unblock request(s): Declined. --ANowlin: talk 03:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Admin: Please extend this block to indef (3 other users have already agreed, but their comments were removed), as well as block the user from editing his talkpage. --ANowlin: talk 04:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply