PerformerResearch

PerformerResearch, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi PerformerResearch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, PerformerResearch. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theopolisme 23:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PerformerResearch/sandbox

Template:PerformerResearch/sandbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SuperMarioMan 00:52, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:19, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, PerformerResearch. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, PerformerResearch. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 21:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, PerformerResearch. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marc Douglas Berardo.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marc Douglas Berardo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marc Douglas Berardo, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marc Douglas Berardo

Hello PerformerResearch. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Marc Douglas Berardo".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Marc Douglas Berardo}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marc Douglas Berardo

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

69.138.187.237 (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

I will be resubmitting. I have run into a few personal challenges Do not delete. I have removed the code as instructed. Thank you.

PR. 69.138.187.237 (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Marc Douglas Berardo was accepted

Marc Douglas Berardo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mblumber (talk) 03:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: "Categories and orphans"

Hello, PerformerResearch. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Marchjuly (talk) 05:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Marc Douglas Berardo

Hi "PerformerResearch",

I see that you have been doing lots of good work on improving Marc Douglas Berardo. Great job!. I have also, however, noticed that it is the only article that you've been editing since joining Wikipedia. There's nothing really wrong with that of course; we all work on articles that interest us. Just be aware that sometimes single-purpose accounts and the articles they edit are scrutinized a little more rigorously than others. Please understand that I am certainly not accusing you of doing anything improper. I just thought it might be a good idea for you (and for the "Marc Douglas Bernardo" article) to spread yourself around a little more (so to speak) and try improving some other articles too. Just a suggestion. - Marchjuly (talk) 08:30, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi "Marchjuly"

Why thanks for the suggestion. I am very new to Wikipedia. I have so much to learn. I created the article and when it was published there were suggestions for me to improve it. I was working on references and notability. It also says something about Widows and Orphans. It is taking me a while to figure that out. I guess I was trying to get it in better shape before I move on to something else.

I also have some additional articles I would like to write.  Also, I would be interested in moving to something else.  Is there a help topic that gives guidance to reviewing other articles?  

I really appreciate your feedback. Performer Research PerformerResearch (talk) 13:37, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

No worries PerformerResearch. I understand exactly where you're coming from. It's sometimes hard to stop editing a particular article, especially one you have created, when you feel so much still needs to be done. Improvements, however, don't have to be made in one fell swoop. It's OK to take your time and it's also OK to step back and let someone else do some of the heavy lifting. There are lots of articles that need help. You might find the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors interesting. The people in that WikiProject just spend their time looking for articles to improve. It might be good practice and less stressful than creating a new article.

Regarding orphaned articles, I'm not sure if you saw my reply to your Teahouse question "Categories and orphans". Basically, you have to find other Wikipedia articles to link to "Marc Douglas Berardo". This seems hard, but it's not really. You can probably find more specific details and help regarding orphans here at the WikiProject Orphanage. Good luck. - Marchjuly (talk) 14:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PerformerResearch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Marc Douglas Berardo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Douglas Berardo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Douglas Berardo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 12:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)