PeterEastern

Archives User_talk:PeterIto: March 2007 - April 2009 /Archive 1: April 2009 - July 2013

A14 (trunk road to the...?)

Thanks for updating some of that stuff on there. I might get a bit of time to take a look at it myself over the next few weeks - I've been putting some basic stuff about it on Transport in East Anglia, particularly about the toll proposals. I don't know whether we have any of that on the main article or not yet? Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:00, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Fyi, I have done some more work on the article and have removed the banner. PeterEastern (talk) 14:50, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hohenzollern Redoubt

Thak you very much for the encouragement; I copied the page here User:Keith-264/sandbox3 to avoid endless edits cluttering the page, on the assumption that I could get it done today. I fear that adding context is going to take a little longer than that – these things just grow[ed] ;O). I would be glad if you looked it over for suggestions as it develops. I've put this page on watch, so if you put comments here I'll see them. Regards.Keith-264 (talk) 14:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I fear that I will have little to add to the article - with my knowledge being limited and my time being short. I did have a close look at my grandfather's diary of the time a while back - which he kept very up-to-date until a month before the battle when it pretty much stopped with silence over the critical period for understandable reasons. He started writing again 6 months later when he had recovered and began by saying that it would not be possible to fill in all the gaps so he would start writing from the current time! As such the only concrete details we have are the battle maps, which I have uploaded to WP already. PeterEastern (talk) 16:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Would you mind if I moved one from the gallery into the text? I appreciate that you're busy so I will work on the seperate draft but you're welcome to look at it and comment whenever; I'll leave a note to let you know when I think it's ready to move to the main page. Thanks again.Keith-264 (talk) 16:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I believe the phrase is 'be bold' ;) Please do whatever you think will improve the article, which is exactly what I did. As I noted on the talk page, I do think it would be good to weave in the 'notable deaths' in some way - possibly into the text rather than in a section, however I think it would be a loss to loose the details entirely. PeterEastern (talk) 17:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject

You may be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Containers. Pkgx (talk) 15:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

9 seater exemption for Congestion Charge

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/congestioncharging/6713.aspx

Does this interest you?

2.98.152.182 (talk) 10:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For the creation of the excellent State-funded schools (England) article. Well done sir! Bleaney (talk) 22:05, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Hohenzollern

Added material.Keith-264 (talk) 17:09, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Table on State-funded schools (England)

Hiya. Just wanted to point out that free schools & academies can also be primary schools, but the table that shows the history of school years implies that they are only secondary schools. Do you think you could modify it? I'm bad at tables! - Bleaney (talk) 11:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I will update it. Probably better to leave messages like this on the article's talk page in future so that others can see them and respond to them. PeterEastern (talk) 12:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I will, it was just so minor I thought i'd go to you direct. Thanks again for all you do. - Bleaney (talk) 11:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Elementary school (United States)

Hello, PeterEastern, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Elementary school (United States), appears to be directly copied from http://answerparty.com/question/answer/what-grades-are-elementry-school. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Elementary school (United States) if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 17:33, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

I copied content from Primary education in god faith, it may indeed be the case that content there was copied from that external source, or that the external source was copied from Wikipedia. PeterEastern (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

First school

Hi Peter:

[1]

I've changed to [2]. Feel free to rectify if I erred.174.3.125.23 (talk) 06:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Peter Principle

I would be interested in your opinion on restoring one of the deleted paragraphs from your cleanup of Peter Principle. --HarryHenryGebel (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Have responded on the article talk page. PeterEastern (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Canal map

I am curious about the canal map you made (uploaded?). Do the rivers and streams include only navigable portions? If not, could it? The map is very busy in its current form, it's difficult to actually see the canals. Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Map for the High Line (New York City) article

Hello. Three years ago, you edited a map for the article High Line (New York City). Would you be able to update it? The High Line's third phase is opening this weekend, so if you are able to edit the map, please do it soon. Thank you, Epicgenius (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I have updated it. Haven't researched where the additional access points are yet and it would be much better if someone did one as an SVG. Shame that Mac Pages, which I use, can't do that. PeterEastern (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Please do not do this

Editing some one elses's words to eliminate obvious mistakes, or to fit into a standardized format is one thing; adding words -and questionably accurate ones, in this case - is another.

I wrote:

By the way, you might want to take a look at http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1977&dat=19400226&id=c2siAAAAIBAJ&sjid=r6sFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1201,5121656

and http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1970&dat=19441213&id=cC4xAAAAIBAJ&sjid=COQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1065,5892495 

The first details the expected replacement of Key's defunct competor with bus in 1940 (i.e., before any PCL/NCL involvement whatsoever,) and the second shows that removal of Berkeley's streetcars was planned, and agreed on, before the NCL takeover. Anmccaff (talk) 06:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

You replaced this with:

• By the way, you might want to take a look at this article from 1940 and this one. The first details the expected replacement of Key's defunct competor with bus in 1940 (i.e., before any PCL/NCL involvement whatsoever,) and the second shows that removal of Berkeley's streetcars was planned, and agreed on, before the NCL takeover. Anmccaff (talk) 06:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

...which can easily be taken to mean that both cites were from 1940.

-- Anmccaff (talk) 17:11, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Tell you what, if you commit to taking more care over formatting, indenting and signing to your talk contributions then I won't touch them. I would much prefer that, and have requested that you do this on a number of occasions. For sure, you have got more reliable at signing comments recently, however the formatting of your comments still leave a lot to be desired as the one you present above clearly demonstrates (before I cleaned it up). Not presenting your comments clearly puts a burden on everyone else. Many sense? Having said that, I did not intend to create ambiguity and will be more careful in future is editing is required. This is the edit that we are talking about. PeterEastern (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

You've scambled the chronological order of the "dispute" thread....

....and left an impression that unconnected sentences were related to each other.Anmccaff (talk) 08:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Not hugely helpful to leave a message like this on my talk page without any reference to talk:General Motors streetcar conspiracy to which it belongs. PeterEastern (talk) 09:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I'd expect that it'd be obvious enough by context, and seen here faster.Anmccaff (talk) 14:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Discussion opened at DRN: General Motors streetcar conspiracy

Hello, PeterEastern. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:General Motors streetcar conspiracy discussion.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bejnar (talk) 02:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

There are additional inquiries at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:General Motors streetcar conspiracy discussion under Inquiry 3 and Inquiry 4? DRN volunteer --Bejnar (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

I appreciate your extensive comment at Inquiry 4, but I do urge you to stick to the specifics of each inquiry. You are correct, your comment was non-responsive to the inquiry, despite how illuminating it was. We will get to larger issues as required, but often the application of Wikipedia policies and guidelines will help curtail excesses, which when curtailed can lead to a less POV article. Focusing on specifics instead of upon a general rewrite can often result in a solution. Please try to respond to the specifics of --Inquiry 4. We all long to leap to a solution, but we need to try to bring other editors along with us. -- DRN volunteer Bejnar (talk) 22:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Guy Span

You guys are polite not to question "Guy Span" as source (with open result) which doesnt seem to be a real name. Did he publish one book, did he appear in a magazine or a newspaper? Is he neutral when calling a concurring theory paranoid? Its hard to make a reference out of him at all, all seems to be from his own website, thats also why we have such a tsunami of footnotes not linking to a reasonable website which is common at any other article.Spearmind (talk) 17:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Given that this issues relates entirely to the General Motors Streetcar Conspiracy article, would it not be best to talk about it there? PeterEastern (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes would be nice if you are going to start this, even if its very late.Spearmind (talk) 18:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Comment re staggered response.

Talk:General Motors streetcar conspiracy‎; 16:08...(→‎Edit request: Not sure why you insist of staggering your response like this - added signature to first para so that people know who wrote it.)

Well, I think it better to separate one request from the other, so they can be dealt with separately. Perhaps bullet points might have worked, but that would not have suggested temporal sequencing as much. Mighta been better to have started it as its own section. Either way, it's almost moot.

And yes, I probably should have signed it twice, if I was intending it to fork. Anmccaff (talk) 16:48, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

There is an ANI discussion you might be interested in.....

There is an ANI discussion you might be interested in:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#I.27d_appreciate_a_general_look_over_at_a_particular_article....

-- unsigned comment by Anmccaff

This has now been archived. PeterEastern (talk) 08:46, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Edwin Black

Hello. Edwin Black has passed along a very long email to me on the falsification of sources by a partisan in the Bus Conspiracy piece. He asked me to pass this along to you. If you wouldn't mind, please drop me an email at ShoeHutch@gmail.com —Thanks! —Tim //// Carrite (talk) 18:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

I strongly suspect if this is relevant to Wiki, it should be posted openly, publicly, rather than asking PE to skulk through back-channels. Anmccaff (talk)

General Motors streetcar conspiracy article and user Anmccaff

Based on user Anmccaff's edits to General Motors streetcar conspiracy and his general contribution history I suspect he either has an extreme bias or is being paid to make edits. Please weigh in at the talk page.--173.27.100.156 (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Reading Coachway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reading Coachway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reading Coachway until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 22:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

MESH Cities

Hi Peter, I am following up on our 2014 discussion on MESH Cities and whether or not it deserves an entry outside of the smart city page. I note that MESH Cities are mentioned in the smart city entry but no further link or detail is offered. Please refer to www.meshcities.com to see the professional acknowledgements the MESH Cities initiative has received as a unique, distinct topic area in discussions around the future of cities.

Regards,

Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertyyz (talk • contribs) 15:20, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PeterEastern. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Framing Effect

Hello could I use your original edit of the Framing Effect article for a project? Thanks you.

Guitarman9911 (talk) 02:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Guitarman9911

Speedy deletion nomination of Self-balancing scooter (personal transporter)

Hello PeterEastern,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Self-balancing scooter (personal transporter) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Self-balancing scooter.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 20:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:US Transportation Research Board logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:US Transportation Research Board logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PeterEastern. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PeterEastern. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Electric kick scooter

Does Talk:Electric kick scooter still need attention after your contribution? If not, please remove attention=yes from WikProject Transport.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 18:53, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Personal transporter --Same question-- --Dthomsen8 (talk) 19:02, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bridj corporation official logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bridj corporation official logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

PeterEastern,

I am interested in your map for part of my thesis project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Great_Britain#/media/File:UK_railway_map.png

I'm trying to create a map showing the historic, heritage and current rail lines in Cambridgeshire. (similar to this map of Norfolk: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railways_in_Norfolk#/media/File:Norfolk_railways.png)

Unfortunately the 'slippy map' version of this image appears to be broken and this image is not high enough resolution for my purposes. Can you advise me on how to find the data for the historic and heritage lines or potentially fix the 'slippy' version of your map.

Regards,

Will — Preceding unsigned comment added by Will J Stephens (talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Noticed you were doing a lot of work on air conditioning, refrigerants etc

Hey! Noticed you were doing a lot of work on climate-change related topics, hope you join us at WP:WikiProject Climate change, Sadads (talk) 01:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Geothermal energy

Geothermal energy has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OpenPlans Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OpenPlans Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Carbon War Room corporate logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carbon War Room corporate logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thoroughfare

The article Thoroughfare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition like article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 07:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)