Peter J Hancock

G'day, welcome.

I rephrased your edit to Ridderschap van Holland (1682) to remove redundancies like "historical" - of course it is a historical novel if it is about this ship - and peacock terms like "critically acclaimed". I've also twice removed your addition to Willem de Vlamingh, on grounds that your novel seems only marginally related to Vlamingh. After all, the subject of the article is Vlamingh, not the Ridderschap, so a novel about the latter hardly seems relevant. And I've reverted your addition to List of 17th century shipwrecks in Australia on the grounds that that list is supposed to contain a bare bones summary, and a modern cultural reference of marginal importance to the subject clearly doesn't belong there. Your contributions to megafauna etc seem reasonable enough, although the cliche "reign of terror" makes me cringe.

Our purpose is to build a great encyclopedia. Clearly yours is to promote your work. These two motives don't necessarily need to be at odds with one another, so long as you keep asking yourself "would inserting a reference to my work here improve the encyclopedia?"

Hesperian 05:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

P.S. Oh, by the way. Have one of these templates:

---

Welcome!

Hello, Peter J Hancock, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Conflict of interest

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Silly rabbit (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry if the above sounds harsh. It wasn't intended as such, and I have no doubt that you have much of value to offer the encyclopedia. However, Hesperian failed to inform you that promotion of ones own work is expressly prohibited under the conflict of interest policy. You are welcome, of course, to contribute in other ways to the encyclopedia. Or, if you feel that your own work may enhance an article, you can suggest its inclusion in the article by posting a message in the article's talk page. Silly rabbit (talk) 15:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)