Speedy deletion of "DataTime"

edit
 

A page you created, DataTime, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 13:02, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removal of speedy deletion templates

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from DataTime, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 13:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

 Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 13:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

DataTime

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of DataTime, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.datatime.eu. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

DataTime

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of DataTime, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.datatime.eu. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of DataTime

edit
 

A tag has been placed on DataTime requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Stijndon (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to DataTime has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 22:40, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to DataTime constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 22:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008

edit

  This is the only warning you will receive. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to DataTime.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy96 21:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply