Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Matthead 12:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Jim Clark

edit

Please stop reverting the Jim Clark article. I believe that you are adding POV which is unnecessary. If you would like to make some constructive changes, please do so by opening a dialogue at Talk:Jim Clark. Reverting does no one good, by through dialogue, a compromise may be reached.--Brian G 19:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Multiple edits as you did to the Jim Clark article is just a multiple revert under another name and IS unacceptable. Please take this to Talk:Jim Clark where it can be progressed in a manner acceptable to all Wikipedians and not just you. M100 08:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

There are anonymous edits on Jim Clark that would appear identical to the ones you were recently perfoming on a very regular basis. Please discuss the prospective changes in Talk:Jim Clark otherwise your continuing editing/reversion of this article might be considered vandalism. M100 11:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you want to edit the Jim Clark page, please do so without arbitrarily deleting work that other people have done. If you do not agree with what someone has written, discuss it on the discussion page. The results table and the infobox that you insist on deleting are an integral part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Formula One and will be reinstated every time you delete them. Please don't waste people's time. Bretonbanquet 14:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --After Midnight 0001 19:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. M100 20:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

User notice: temporary 3RR block

edit

Regarding reversions[1] made on September 17 2006 to Jim Clark

edit
 
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 20:08, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blocked again

edit

I've blocked you again because your sock got blocked for 3RR. Please stick to one account William M. Connolley 18:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 08:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blocked yet again

edit
 
It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten, and you are therefore blocked for period of one week.
You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires.
 

KiloT 19:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blocked, as of October 21

edit
 
It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (2nd), and you are therefore blocked for period of one month.
You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires.
 

KiloT 21:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (3rd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. M100 01:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (4th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 05:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (4th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 19:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

3 month block

edit

The block on this account has been extended to 3 months for sockpuppetry, disruption, and violations of WP:OWN. The use of sockpuppets to evade a user block can result in banning a user from Wikipedia. DurovaCharge! 14:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (5th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Indefinite block

edit

Your block has been extended to indefinite for continued sockpuppetry. DurovaCharge! 17:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pflanzgarten for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Baseball Watcher 23:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply