Phaser501

Spam in 911 Missing Links

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 911 Missing Links, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 911 Missing Links is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 911 Missing Links, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm leaving this note as a response to your question in the AFD page. Right now, the main problem with the article is that it does not demonstrate the notability of the documentary - it needs citations from mainstream media sources such as newspapers or magazines describing and/or analyzing the work. The tone of the article did not seem overly promotional to me, but people are probably inferring that it's a promotional article because it does not really demonstrate the movie's notability, and therefore (in their eyes) appears to exist solely to promote the movie. There is some information on notability and how to demonstrate it at WP:N and WP:V, and if you have any questions about how to go about sources and how to add them, I'll be glad to provide answers. Just click on the "Moo" in my signature to leave a message on my talk page. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 20:45, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

• If there aren't any sources out yet, it's probably not going to be kept at AFD, unfortunately. The good news is that if it does garner some additional coverage, then there would be no barrier to you re-creating it then. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 13:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:911ct supporters

Template:911ct supporters has been nominated for deletion by Ice Cold Beer. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in Template:911ct, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of Template:911ct, following the guideline on multiple messages.) Regards —  Cs32en  08:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)