Phillip1978

Welcome!

Hello, Phillip1978, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Angela White did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Little Einsteins have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Little Einsteins was changed by Phillip1978 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956037 on 2021-01-23T20:32:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:32, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Hdiddan. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!--Hdiddan (talk) 20:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lana Del Rey. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Blablubbs|talk 20:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Justina Valentine, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 20:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Ronson. Stop messing around Meters (talk) 20:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 20:51, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Unblock #1

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phillip1978 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I vandalized a variety of articles on Wikipedia. 1. Do not be a vandal. 2. This user is blocked. 3. What is a block? A block is when accounts and IPs and IP ranges can not edit Wikipedia. I used my sandbox. Phillip1978 (talk) 20:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock #2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phillip1978 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have to be unblocked from the site because I was blocked. Regarding My Blocked User! This account has been blocked across all articles. Read Wikipedia until I can edit about the TV show. Little Einsteins has two seasons and 69 episodes is for everybody. Wikipedia is for everybody can edit articles. This Wikipedian lives in Ohio. Phillip1978 (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is unintelligible. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock #3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phillip1978 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked from the site because I was blocked when I was 161 months old. This account has vandalized a variety of articles. Phillip1978 (talk) 00:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As your requests continue to make no sense, I am declining your request and removing talk page access. It appears that you lack the skills needed to participate here. Should that change and you are able to make a coherent request, you may use WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 00:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your email

The answer is "no". You lack the maturity and the competence to edit Wikipedia. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:50, 28 January 2021 (UTC)