February 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Travis Miller, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Speedy deletion nomination of Emily stichter

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emily stichter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Luke (Talk) 03:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Cassatt with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Cassatt, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mary Cassatt was changed by Philthegreatone (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860711 on 2012-02-23T13:28:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Teen Titans (TV series). DVdm (talk) 13:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply