Photographynerd24

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canon HF S10 has been accepted

Canon HF S10, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Shuan Hern Lee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shuan Hern Lee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --- Possibly ☎ 23:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Paul Ji moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Paul Ji, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --- Possibly ☎ 23:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello. This article has no inline sources, and no sources at all other than external links. The article mentioned above this one has one source. We like to see numerous sources in an article, and to have most claims and facts supported by sourcing. You can develop the above two pages in draft space until you have added enough sourcing for them to be moved to article space. --- Possibly ☎ 23:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

I looked at this page again since you asked on my talk page. I removed the unsourced material. You also cannot use Facebook as a source, so I removed that. Are these articles for people you know-- someone you are connected to?04:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop replying to me on my talk page when the question is asked here. It breaks up the thread. Reply in the same place. You should be careful moving articles directly to article space, as you don't know enough about Wikipedia policies yet to create a good article. You should use AFC. Finally, it does not sound like you have a conflict of interest. Thanks. --- Possibly ☎ 04:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop replying to me on my talk page when the question is asked here. It breaks up the thread. --- Possibly ☎ 04:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi again, I really apologize for the inconvenience caused, and thanks for the advice. I will read Wikipedia policies more carefully now, and will use AFC in the future. If I understand the rules, I will attempt moving straight to mainspace once I have put some articles through the AFC for more experienced users to review.

OK. You just added a large 3KB edit that looked quite professional; are you being paid to create these pages? --- Possibly ☎ 07:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi, no I am not paid to edit. I just had the inspiration and interest in becoming a Wikipedia editor, and I just like writing about people.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Photographynerd24/sandbox/William Wu

A tag has been placed on User:Photographynerd24/sandbox/William Wu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

[I don't want this page anymore]

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Photographynerd24 (talk) 07:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)