Photonic23

Martin Regehly

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Articles are not automatically accepted as ready for mainspace in English just because they're translations of articles that already exist on other language Wikipedias; please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. So you can't just move the article into mainspace, you have to submit it to the WP:AFC queue for review first. Bearcat (talk) 13:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Martin Regehly has a new comment

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Martin Regehly. Thanks! Thanks, Wikieditor019 (If I do not respond, please visit my talk page) 12:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Regehly (July 3)

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Karnataka were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Articles written by the subject cannot meet the notability criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Regehly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Karnataka (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Photonic23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Karnataka (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Martin Regehly

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Photonic23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martin Regehly".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 08:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic