Physicist5777

Welcome!

Hello, Physicist5777, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Anal sex, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ivanka Trump have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Materialscientist. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 12:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your edits to Ivanka Trump were reverted because they altered her name without providing appropriate sourcing and because you altered the lead paragraph with no support from the body of the article. Please read WP:BLP: sourcing is essential, and please refrain from personal attacks against editors who enforce this policy. Acroterion (talk) 12:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

ALERT

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

New editors can't edit articles on I/P conflict

Hello.Please read alert that I posted above and don't edit/create pages about the conflict per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30.Thanks.--Shrike (talk) 11:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Apparent vandalism

How can I help? PhilKnight (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I edited a new article and soon after it was destroyed by some user. Currently it is rewritten by other users. I did not enter an edit war because it is inappropriate but I think the new article is not objective. The article was Regularization Bill.

I believe I may be able to explain this. A while ago, to deal with the regular edit wars and disputes that arose from the editing of articles relating to the Arab/Israeli conflict, the site's Arbitration Committee issued a series of binding remedies. One of these remedies is that users who have less than 500 edits and 30 days tenure on Wikipedia cannot edit (or, by extension, create) articles relating to the conflict. Since you have fewer than 500 edits at this point in time, you are not permitted to edit or create articles about topics that relate to the conflict. Once you pass the 500 edit mark, you will be permitted to edit the article. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Shrike. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shrike (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

First of all you shouldn't edit articles about the conflict as it was explained to you and the head of Israeli right-wing pro-settlement party is definitely is related, you can use the talk page if you have some edits to propose.Second I fixed the dead link if you have some other WP:RS that says other ways you can raise it on the talk page.Third I watch all Israeli-related pages I don't have particular interest in you edits.--Shrike (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Sorry but your censorship and obsession is unacceptable. Perhaps you are accustomed to it but I am surely not. The article I edited is unrelated and you are apparently some watch committee to praise and glorify political individuals of your political opinions but that does not give you the right to destroy my edits or deliberately spread false information. You are informed that the individual in question is not holder of any academic degree and yet refuse to correct the entry. Furthermore, please don't harass me with these things. I am not interested in edit wars of any kind. Physicist5777 (talk) 11:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)