PibeDeOuro
|
Max Meyer
editI have declined the request to move the page. What you need to do is start a discussion on the talk page of Max Friedrich Meyer (with a link to the discussion from the talk page of Max Meyer (footballer)) and reach a consensus on whether the redirect would be acceptable.
As this could be considered a controversial move, it is not a G6 deletion.
If you get a clear consensus which matches what you asked for, contact me in a week and I'll do the move.
Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
June 2018
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Nike sponsorships has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Nike sponsorships was changed by PibeDeOuro (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86773 on 2018-06-19T21:33:53+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:33, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Luisa Neubauer
editPlease stop deleting proven content. Lets keep it neutral and give a full picture. For exemple if you mention her grandmother, you should mention forced labour by the family firm etc. so lets leave it. Furthermore there are alot of discussion if anti-male propagando it the right way, etc. etc. all in all stop whitewashing or i will start to black paint and then so can clean it up. i wouls be easier to just keep a neutral arcticle, — Preceding unsigned comment added by DTilmann (talk • contribs) 12:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
editYour recent editing history at Luisa Neubauer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You and your counterpart are acting like idiots, edit warring over this content. If you don't stop, someone will block you. Drmies (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. Luisa Neubauer has been the target of multiple edit wars. We need to calm down. Anyway, I'll stop getting involved in these situations. 3125A Talk! Edits! 19:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Let's talk
editIt appears that you are edit warring on Luisa Neubauer. Please talk on the article's talk page. We can discuss this on the talk page in my section here. 3125A Talk! Edits! 19:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Max Meyer
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Max Meyer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Happy editing--IAmChaos 00:21, 1 February 2022 (UTC)