Pigletbasil

A page you started (Bhurit Bhirombhakdi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bhurit Bhirombhakdi.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Bhurit Bhirombhakdi. Note that other editors have raised some serious concerns about Mr. Bhirombhakdi's eligibility for Wikipedia. Follow the links in the notice at the top of the page. If these issues are not addressed, other editors could call for the article to be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhurit Bhirombhakdi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhurit Bhirombhakdi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhurit Bhirombhakdi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dial911 (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Locallion per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Locallion. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 09:16, 19 April 2023 (UTC)