Archive 110Archive 114Archive 115Archive 116Archive 117Archive 118Archive 120

Wikidata weekly summary #345

Here is a much more complete obituary for wife, Diana, of Harry Mark Petrakis

Wed. 01/02

Dear Andy,

Lambrini Papangelis here, that wanted to note on the "Harry Mark Petrakis" Wikipedia page that HMP's wife, Diana, has died. PLEASE DISREGARD that first obituary I sent you; it was not even an obituary. Here, rather, is a "feature article obituary" about Diana Petrakis that appeared in the Jan. 1, 2019 Chicago Sun-Times.

Diana Petrakis

https://chicago.suntimes.com/?post_type=cst_article...

After you make the edit to the "Infobox" to note Mrs. Petrakis's passing, if you want to add this Sun-Times obituary to "External Links" at the bottom of the HMP article, that will be fine with me.

Thank you.

Lambrini Papangelis Lambrini Papangelis (talk) 13:17, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

1820s shipwreck lists

Please take a look at all ten lists covering 1820-29. Do you think that they would benefit from splitting? No need to tag them, just let me know either by a ping her or a message at my talk. Mjroots (talk) 16:06, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

@Mjroots: Sizes in bytes:

  • 1820 = 355,439
  • 1821 = 427,728
  • 1822 = 419,264
  • 1823 = 462,801
  • 1824 = 390,522
  • 1825 = 504,378
  • 1826 = 320,573
  • 1827 = 219,577
  • 1828 = 214,704
  • 1829 = 268,619

Even the smallest of these needs to be split into four or six, if not twelve, pieces. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

OK, I'll finish ploughing through The Times for 1851 (currently up to 7 Nov) and then split them, probably over the weekend. Will split all into months like the 1830s and 1840s lists. Mjroots (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

List of recipients of the George Medal, 1940s

Hi, you neglected to include a couple of London Gazette issue numbers in List of recipients of the George Medal, 1940s (refs. 147 & 148). Can you look them up? Thanks, wbm1058 (talk) 01:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

The person who added the citations neglected to do so; I merely reformatted them. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Oh, I see. I hadn't noticed your dummy edit after your initial edit that created the page. Your split did make the errors more obvious, though. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
OK, I looked up both of them and fixed the template parameters. Both were added by drive-by editors, likely family members. – wbm1058 (talk) 18:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #346

Template:Taxobox authority

Is there any reason why {{Taxobox authority}} could not support botanical authors, where the date isn't present? Maybe it wouldn't be useful. {{Taxobox authority/sandbox}} makes the date optional, allowing (when live):

{{Taxobox authority|author=Smith|date=1899}}
{{Taxobox authority|Smith|1899}}
{{Taxobox authority|author=Smith}}
{{Taxobox authority|Smith}}

Peter coxhead (talk) 17:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

What utter horse poop is this?

I just wanted to express empathy/solidarity with you for having acted in good faith and received horse poop in return. The levelheadedness of your reply made me chuckle. Levelheadedness is one word! That's one to remember for scrabble, if anyone still plays that! Edaham (talk) 03:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2018

 




Headlines
  • Armenia report: Cooperation with Yerevan Drama Theatre Named After Hrachia Ghaplanian; Singing Wikipedia (continuation); Photographs by Vahan Kochar (continuation)
  • Australia report: 2019 Australia's Year of the Public Domain
  • Belgium report: Writing weeks German-speaking Community; End of year drink; Wiki Loves Heritage photo contest
  • Brazil report: Google Art and GLAM initiatives in Brazil
  • India report: Collaboration with RJVD Municipal Public Library
  • Italy report: Challenges and alliances with libraries, WLM and more
  • Macedonia report: Exhibition:"Poland through photographs" & Wikipedia lectures with children in social risk
  • Malaysia report: Technology Talk and Update on Wikipedia @ National Library of Malaysia
  • Portugal report: Glam Days '18 at the National Library of Portugal
  • Sweden report: Hats 🎩🧢👒🎓
  • UK report: Oxford
  • USA report: Holiday gatherings and visit to Internet Archive
  • Wikidata report: Wikidata reports
  • WMF GLAM report: Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons: pilot projects and multilingual captions
  • Calendar: January's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

TfD notice

A module you've been ivolved with is up for deletion at TfD: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_January_9#Module:Common_abbreviations_(meta)/data. – Uanfala (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #347

17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Note on Rahaf

Hi, not sure what “warning” on the reference you are referring to. Can you please clarify? Please ping me on your response. Thank you Bohbye (talk) 17:51, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@Bohbye: Look at reference 6 in this version of the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Got it. I was confused what the warning on your comment was about. Thanks for the explanation. Bohbye (talk) 23:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Deborah Bone for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deborah Bone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Bone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chrisahn (talk) 04:53, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Goya

Thanks for this[12]. There was a lot of angst on the talk, but case closed now, afaic. Ceoil (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Latitude and longitude of cities

 

A tag has been placed on Latitude and longitude of cities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ajf773 (talk) 06:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #348

Request for assistance RE notability - Ebbe Nielsen Prize page

Hi Andy, yesterday I raised the pre-existing page Ebbe Nielsen Prize from a redirect to an article in its own right with info on the prize/history/recipients (including myself as the last one, potential COI declared on the "Talk" page), however someone has added a tag to the effect that the subject's notability may be in question. I have removed myself from deciding such an issue, but would you be interested in taking a look and seeing what you or other "wikipedian of note" might think, with a view to removing the tag if you believe this is warranted? Any attention/review would be appreciated. Best - Tony Tony 1212 (talk) 04:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the attention, I think your decision is the correct one! Regards - Tony Tony 1212 (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)