User talk:Pigsonthewing/Archive 182

Archive 175Archive 180Archive 181Archive 182Archive 183Archive 184Archive 185

Proposed deletion of Tetranitratoxycarbon

 

The article Tetranitratoxycarbon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SUSTAINED notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #569

Tech News: 2023-17

MediaWiki message delivery 22:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

Women in Red May 2023

 
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

WikiProject Worcestershire Newsletter - May 2023

Tech News: 2023-18

MediaWiki message delivery 01:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Lunar Society Moonstones for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lunar Society Moonstones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunar Society Moonstones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #570

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

  Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


The Signpost: 8 May 2023

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #571

Tech News: 2023-19

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: April 2023

 




Headlines
  • Albania report: International Roma Day Edit-a-thon in Albania, 2023
  • Brazil report: "Every Book its Public" Campaign and Strategic Committee on Libraries
  • Czech Republic report: What's new at GLAM in the Czech Republic
  • Indonesia report: GLAM Mini Grants; Structured Data Marathon VIII; Wikisource Online Workshop
  • Italy report: Bridges between Wikimedia and culture
  • New Zealand report: BHL Whitepaper and outreach for Citizen Science Month and WeDigBio, Auckland Museum suburbs project update, New Zealand Women in Architecture Wikidata Project
  • Poland report: Another meeting of EU GLAM Coordinators; Guided tours for Wikipedians in museums in Krakow; Presentation on Art in Wikipedia; Online training on the basics of copyright law; Polish monuments among the top winners of WLM
  • Sweden report: ISOF workshop; More articles from students; SAAB veterans shared their knowledge during metadata edit-a-thon; ArkDes edit-a-thons
  • UK report: Democratising knowledge and cultural diversity
  • USA report: Into the Wikiverse; Earth Day 2023 Bushwick
  • Content Partnerships Hub report: Wikipedia day pitches by FAO and IEA
  • Wiki Loves Living Heritage report: Activities are starting!
  • WMF GLAM report: Biodiversity Heritage Library whitepaper and the #1Lib1Ref campaign
  • Calendar: May's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Use of date templates in television project templates

In doing some maintenance in the television project, some questions came up about proper formatting of dates within certain templates such as {{Infobox television episode}}. In that template, the |airdate= parameter is documented to allow for multiple dates to be included as a bulleted list. However, it also asks for the date to be formatted with {{Start date}}. Having done a lot of cleanup on {{Episode list}} lists, I know of the notes included in the documentation about hCalendar microformat and emitting metadata (specifically this note: Template:Episode_list/doc#Notes). So when it was asked how this particular warning applies to other templates we use (such as the episode infobox I mentioned), no one currently working in the project on templates or date format clean up seemed to have an answer. I researched the history of notes in the docs and that's what led me to you - specifically with this edit: [21]. I sheepishly admit I don't understand the "why" around the limitation in {{Episode list}}. I merely know that it exists and therefore patrol use of the template for improperly implemented dates. But since I don't understand "why", when it comes to other templates, I don't know what the proper display should be, nor could I support it in a discussion. So in an instance of {{Infobox television episode}} where |airdate= is two dates (such as a two part episode), we'd include a bulleted list of dates. Should that be like this:

| airdate = 
* {{Start date|2020|01|01}} (Part 1)
* January 2, 2020 (Part 2)

Or would it be like this:

| airdate = 
* {{Start date|2020|01|01}} (Part 1)
* {{Start date|2020|01|02}} (Part 2)

I have been doing the former, but as I noted, I can't support that in a discussion other than referring back to an inexact example (that of the {{Episode list}}'s use of {{Start date}}).

I hope this isn't too lengthy of a question, and I hope you can enlighten me, or possibly point me in the correct direction. TIA. ButlerBlog (talk) 20:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

hCalendar requires a date in a format which {{Start date}} supplies; but it only needs - and can only use - one such date. It should be the start date for the entity to which the parent template describes. Which in the case of the infobox, is the episode (one per infobox, or one per row, in the templates you mention), not its individual parts. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks! I think I understand a little better (but only a little). So I would assume that in the case of the airdate for {{Infobox television episode}} for a two part episode, the airdate really should be something like:
| airdate = 
* {{Start date|2020|01|01}} (Part 1)
* {{End date|2020|01|02}} (Part 2)
And in the case of a multi-part (more than 2) episode:
| airdate = 
* {{Start date|2020|01|01}} (Part 1)
* January 2, 2020 (Part 2)
* {{End date|2020|01|03}} (Part 3)
Am I on the right track? ButlerBlog (talk) 21:12, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #572

Tech News: 2023-20

MediaWiki message delivery 21:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Motherless (disambiguation)

 

The article Motherless (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic redirect points to an article with a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)