Pikipaki2222
Pikipaki2222, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Pikipaki2222! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC) |
August 2016
edit
Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Pál Milkovics. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:
|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]
Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:
|image=SomeImage.jpg.
There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Pál Milkovics, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
@Zackmann08: Dear Zackmann08, I have tried to write you to your talk page, which maybe was inappropriate. Please do apologies to remove the warning repeatedly. I would like to ask your quick comment why you think the references provided are not reliable? I have double checked Wikipedia guidelines and used to find link as suggested in the inbox (for example through Google news, see here: Pal Milkovics google news ). Please note this is my first article to edit, and probably and I hope I do not cause you too much trouble. Many thanks, Pikipaki2222 (talk) 06:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
@Zackmann08: Dear Zackman, with all due respect, I have tried to get in touch with you several times, without any luck to get your response, advise why you still think that the article for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pál_Milkovics should be deleted despite adding references, I would like to ask you not to revert the edit (or please advise why you do it) and suggest the page for deletition. Many thanks, Pikipaki2222 (talk) 19:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Your multiple attempts were in rather poor and broken english and appear to have been done through a translator thus making it difficult for me to understand. You have repeatedly added WP:UNRELIABLE sources, included sources that are not in English. Why don't you create the page on the Czech wikipedia: cs.wikipedia.org since that appears to be your native language. I am sorry to say that your English skills are not very great and are making this article difficult to pass. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
@Zackmann08: Dear Zackmann, thank you very much for your feedback. Please do apologise for my English, yes I am not a native speaker, but I am writing you without any use of translator. I am trying to be as useful as possible for the WIKIPEDIA community and do appreciate any thoughts on how I can improve. I most definitely will work to correct the mistakes in the article, adding more English references. Please let me express my disagreement with you that the article has been proposed for deletion, I can see that this article is on Wikipedia since more than 8 years. In my opinion the article should be in English because it has many references in Czech, Finish, Swedish and Hungarian (beside the English one), and Milkovics does business internationally. Looking forward to hear from you. Pikipaki2222 (talk) 08:54, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
Welcome!
|
User:Piiiiiiiii222345 alternate account?
editHi Pikipaki2222. Is User:Piiiiiiiii222345 is an alternate account of yours? Usually we don't use multiple accounts on Wikipedia (See WP:SOCK), but for certain reasons (see WP:SOCKLEGIT) we may use it. If this is an alternate account, you can simply add a tag to your user page. If you want I can help you to do that. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
edit | This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pikipaki2222. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC) |
Pikipaki2222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Vanjagenije, I would like to kindly ask you to revise your decision to block me. I do understand what I was blocked for, and of course I won't do it again. These two accounts indeed belong to me, with Piiiiiiiii222345 account I only made 4 edits, this account I used temporarily because I haven't had access to the Pikipaki2222 account of mine, so I created a new one (immidiately after I was able to log on to it, I have never logged to Piiiiiiiii222345 again). I have no intention to promote the article in question, and this is my very first article of which I would like finish first and then to move on creating others (please see my contributions). I am totally new to wikipedia and this was my first article, and while I have made mistakes, especially from User:Zackmann08 I got quiet a cold welcome (he tried to delete the article itself) and he did report this duplicate account right after a discussion on his talk page today, in which I advised him about seeking help from wikipedia noticeboard. Please see the article's talk page in question talk page and User:Zackmann08 talk page on which in my message at 06:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC) I advised him that I will seek for the notice board help and then after one hour of that he reported me for Sock puppetry. I only got a message about the duplicate account on my talk page at 07:21 from User:Lemongirl942 never anything from User:Zackmann08 (after 30 minutes of the message on my talk page I was reported for Sock puppetry). Pikipaki2222 (talk) 12:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Procedural acceptance as the block has already expired. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- You are welcome to continue to point the finger at me as much as you want, but that doesn't change the fact that you have violated Wikipedia policies left and right. Removing maintenance templates, threatening an established editor with WP:AIV and abusing multiple accounts. However "cold" you think my welcome was, and I assure you there are editors who would have been MUCH harsher on you, it does not excuse the multiple transgressions you have made. Additionally, rather then owning up to them and trying to correct the issues, which would go a LONG way, you have continued to blame myself and Lemongirl for your mistakes. Not helping your cause. Additionally, the fact that you are a WP:SPA who has made zero edits outside of the context of this one article makes it clear that you have a WP:COI. What is your relation to Pál Milkovics? --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Zackmann08:, you right, you are experienced, and you made an absolutely new to wikipedia editor blocked. I made a mistake which I was not even aware, and have no chance to correct it, as I wrote in my previous message, I do accept responsibility with that. However it is daunting your and as you say others "experienced" editors attitude towards new editors, even in your words you were too "harsh with me". Please read your own word from Lemongirl's talk page: "I need to get better about not biting the newcomers. I will confess it is rather irritating when someone with 79 edits (all about the same article) comes along and threatens to report me to administrators because they don't like the way Wikipedia works. That being said, I agree that a better job could be done. Thank you for the advice. --Zackmann08" I can sense you have a revenge going on here, for what I have done to you, and that the page you nominated was not deleted and as well you feel a threat if you'd be reported to an administrator. Why are you feel that is a threat? Anyway you have a record to be in favour to (unjust) nominate pages for deletion, or mark vandalism, when there is no vandalism, etc, As I several times stated (just read above) this is my first article, I couldn't have more edit or other articles, because since a month I am just working on to keep the first I edited. My question is, what is YOUR relation to Pál Milkovics? You seems so interested to this article with a lot prejudice, I really have the thoughts that you have some bad experience with him or it is me just because a new comer edit is so "irritating" as you said? I really thought that as an experienced user as you are, you could help me become a better editor, not fight me. Anyway, this goes nowhere, I do not want to argue with you, I really don't get it what is it in this for you, or why are you so irritated, as you say. I am sure you can find several way the block me again, or make it impossible me to work, but I kindly would like to ask you to move on, let me finish the article and then let me focus on creating other contribution for Wikipedia. Pikipaki2222 (talk)
October 2016
edit Please do not use thumbnails inside of infoboxes as you did to Pál Milkovics. Note that this is your second warning regarding this issue. Continuing to add thumbnails will be seen as disruptive editing. For more information please see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE. When adding an image, instead of doing:
|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]
You can simply supply the name of the image. So in this case just do:
|image=SomeImage.jpg.
There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you @Zackmann08: I have corrected it. Nice to hear from you again. I have did further information gathering for the article, I hope this will be finally convince you. Have a nice evenig. Pikipaki2222 (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
User uploaded images do not constitute Reliable sources. If you wish to cite a news article you may do so, but adding massive images to the references section is NOT a valid way to cite a source. Continuing to do so will be considered Disruptive editing. I understand you are trying to cite your sources, try looking at {{Cite news}}. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:43, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you @Zackmann08: I will do it according the guideline. Pikipaki2222 (talk) 17:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Additionally please fead Help:Maintenance template removal. You should not remove the notability template at the top of the page. It is clear that you disagree with it but you must seek consensus before removing it. Additionally you have a known and established WP:COI here. You are welcome to edit the page and attempt to demonstrate the notability of the subject, but removing the maintenance template is not appropriate. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing)
- Dear @Zackmann08:, I have told you several times I have zero interest with the person in question, I really don'y know why you are so invested to discredit me or block me out from Wikipedia. I have several times read through the notability guideline, and it is not my feelings but the article it does comply, and with the added new references even further, with guideline. I really thought I don't have to but it is indeed I must seek help hear. I invested so much time here to improve, but you are keep coming back to delete my work or threaten me . Pikipaki2222 (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Nothing I have said is in any way, shape or form a threat. I have also never blocked you. I am not an administrator and thus and incapable of blocking you. You say you keep trying to add citations, however No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. The fact that this is the only page you have ever worked on is one of the many reasons it is clear you have a WP:COI. Otherwise you would have invested time in other topics and articles. Saying you "have zero interest with the person in question" is just patently false. You clearly have an interest, why else would you be editing the page so much? As for trying to delete your page, I'm sorry but that is how wikipedia works. It is self-governed. Otherwise there would be a Wikipedia page for every person on the planet. If a consensus to keep the page is reached, that is fine. I'll move on to the many other things I am working on. But so far only you and your WP:SOCKs have voiced desires to keep the page. I must also tell you that your poor English makes it very difficult to communicate with you. Have you considered creating the page the wiki in your native language? You might have better luck there. Just a thought. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- So I'm just curious after all that are you actually going to make substantive contributions or now that your page got deleted are you giving up since that page was your only purpose here? --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- Nothing I have said is in any way, shape or form a threat. I have also never blocked you. I am not an administrator and thus and incapable of blocking you. You say you keep trying to add citations, however No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. The fact that this is the only page you have ever worked on is one of the many reasons it is clear you have a WP:COI. Otherwise you would have invested time in other topics and articles. Saying you "have zero interest with the person in question" is just patently false. You clearly have an interest, why else would you be editing the page so much? As for trying to delete your page, I'm sorry but that is how wikipedia works. It is self-governed. Otherwise there would be a Wikipedia page for every person on the planet. If a consensus to keep the page is reached, that is fine. I'll move on to the many other things I am working on. But so far only you and your WP:SOCKs have voiced desires to keep the page. I must also tell you that your poor English makes it very difficult to communicate with you. Have you considered creating the page the wiki in your native language? You might have better luck there. Just a thought. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:08, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Dear @Zackmann08:, I have told you several times I have zero interest with the person in question, I really don'y know why you are so invested to discredit me or block me out from Wikipedia. I have several times read through the notability guideline, and it is not my feelings but the article it does comply, and with the added new references even further, with guideline. I really thought I don't have to but it is indeed I must seek help hear. I invested so much time here to improve, but you are keep coming back to delete my work or threaten me . Pikipaki2222 (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Additionally please fead Help:Maintenance template removal. You should not remove the notability template at the top of the page. It is clear that you disagree with it but you must seek consensus before removing it. Additionally you have a known and established WP:COI here. You are welcome to edit the page and attempt to demonstrate the notability of the subject, but removing the maintenance template is not appropriate. --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing)