Pkwildy69

Hey Pk, welcome to the 'pedia! Thanks for working on the Keira High School. Unfortunately, I think some of the stuff you're adding is going to have to be removed, unless we can find a published source that has this info in it. See, nothing can go in wikipedia articles unless it's already been published somewhere, otherwise it's considered original research and not permissible. This has to do with our very fundamental verifiability policy. Anyway, yeah, sorry about that. But definitely keep adding info from published sources! Wikipedia can take a little getting used to, definitely let me know if you need any help or anything! Leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or want to discuss anything. Peace, delldot talk 12:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey again, another thing: I'm not sure that the info on individual teachers' names is important enough for an encyclopedia article on the school. Wikipedia seeks to write articles on notable subjects. So I'm going to go ahead and remove the list of teachers, since I don't think it belongs in the encyclopedia. We can discuss it more if you like, please just leave me a note on my talk page. Peace, delldot talk 12:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Haydn Low

A tag has been placed on Haydn Low requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Carados (talk) 02:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-Carados (talk) 02:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked from editing. -02:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Your image question

Thanks for the note. Yeah, unfortunately, it's worse than that: the site has to actually release the image under a copyright license compatible with the GFDL, so pretty much anyone can use it (i.e., just allowing Wikipedia to use it isn't enough). You can request permission by following the directions at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission#For images. Under very limited conditions, a picture may qualify as fair use, but you have to be pretty familiar with that policy to get that to work. Let me know how I can help with any of this! Peace, delldot talk 06:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Haydn Low

A tag has been placed on Haydn Low requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Zsinj^Talk 12:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Big girl p. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Keira High School, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Mount Ousley Public School

A tag has been placed on Mount Ousley Public School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Mount Ousley Public School and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 12:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mount Ousley Public School

A tag has been placed on Mount Ousley Public School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sting au Buzz Me... 12:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 12:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Alan Didak has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Asphatasawhale (talk) 07:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ashton Low

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 02:08, 10 October 2008 (UTC)