PlasticJesus341
|
==Non-free use disputed for Image:Grandpa.jpg==
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Grandpa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:In A Cave.jpg)
editThanks for uploading Image:In A Cave.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Rickrolling do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kip Kip 10:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
July 2008
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lord Voldemort. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Magidin (talk) 05:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi! You stated that the reference didn't say anything like that, when this is what it says; "Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts intensified to find a peaceful, long-term solution to the current conflict.
The top U.S. diplomat for Africa, Assistant Secretary of State Jendayi Frazer, was to meet with Congo President Joseph Kabila in Kinshasa Thursday, and may travel to Rwanda to see President Paul Kagame, Deputy State Department spokesman Robert Wood told reporters in Washington.
Wood said Frazer, who is accompanied by a senior researcher from the National Security Council, will try to "get all of the parties to agree to respect international law and human rights."
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice also spoke with Kagame and was in touch with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, Wood said." It states that diplomatic efforts intensified; then, after saying who spoke to Kagame about peace, says "... Rice also spoke with Kagame."
See what I'm saying? Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:25, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- No problem dude, no worries! :) As for the interviews; I've been wanting to create a "causes" section for a while but there hasn't been too much to work with. Mind if you give me the links so that I can check them out? Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 05:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- The FT source seems great. How would you work that in? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 04:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
July 2010
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Birthday. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. gz33 (talk) 02:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
A goat for you!
editYou are awesome thanks